Chapter 12: Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall
12.13.
Suppose that each of two investments has a 4% chance of a loss of $10 million, a 2% chance of a
loss of $1 million, and a 94% chance of a profit of $1 million. They are independent of each
other.
(a) What is the VaR for one of the investments when the confidence level is 95%?
(b) What is the expected shortfall when the confidence level is 95%?
(c) What is the VaR for a portfolio consisting of the two investments when the confidence level is
95%?
(d) What is the expected shortfall for a portfolio consisting of the two investments when the
confidence level is 95%?
(e) Show that, in this example, VaR does not satisfy the subadditivity condition whereas expected
shortfall does.
(a) A loss of $1 million extends from the 94 percentile point of the loss distribution to the 96
(b) The expected shortfall for one of the investments is the expected loss conditional that the loss
(c) For a portfolio consisting of the two investments there is a 0.04 × 0.04 = 0.0016 chance that
(d) The expected shortfall for the portfolio consisting of the two investments is the expected loss
(e) VaR does not satisfy the subadditivity condition because 9 > 1 + 1. However, expected
12.14.
Suppose that daily changes for a portfolio have first-order correlation with correlation
parameter 0.12. The 10-day VaR, calculated by multiplying the one-day VaR by
, is $2
million. What is a better estimate of the VaR that takes account of autocorrelation?
The correct multiplier for the variance is
The estimate of VaR should be increased to
= 2.229