Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Revenues (10,000 X $30)
Cost of goods sold
Selling and administrative
expenses
Net income
$300,000
240,000
25,000
$ 35,000
$ 300,000
( (240,000)
( (25,000)
$ 35,000
(1) Variable costs = $3,060,000 – $900,000 = $2,160,000;
(2) Variable costs = $360,000 – $180,000 = $180,000;
increased by $35,000.
(c) Unit selling price = $24 (variable manufacturing costs) + $2.50 (variable
(d) Nonquantitative factors to be considered are: (1) possible effect on
increasing costs.
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Direct materials (5,000 X $4.75)
Direct labor (5,000 X $4.60)
Indirect labor (5,000 X $.45)
Utilities (5,000 X $.35)
Depreciation
Property taxes
Insurance
Purchase price
Freight and inspection
(5,000 X $.30)
Receiving costs
Total annual cost
$23,750
23,000
2,250
1,750
2,000
700
1,500
0
0
0
$54,950
$ 0
0
0
0
900
200
600
56,000
1,500
500
$59,700
($ 23,750
( 23,000
( 2,250
( 1,750
( 1,100
( 500
( 900
( (56,000)
(
(1,500)
(500)
($ (4,750)
(c) The decision would be different. Because of the opportunity cost of
$6,000, net income will be $1,250 higher if FIZBE is purchased as shown
below:
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Total annual cost
Opportunity cost
Total cost
General-Purpose Cleaner Not Processed Further
ShineBrite (750,000 ÷ 25) X $15
General-Purpose Cleaner (250,000 ÷ 20) X $20
Additional costs for ShineBrite
General-Purpose is Processed Further
ShineBrite (750,000 ÷ 25) X $15
Premium Cleaner (250,000 ÷ 20) X $16
Premium Stain Remover (250,000 ÷ 20) X $16
Additional costs for ShineBrite
cleaner further.
PROBLEM 7-3B (Continued)
Don’t Process
G-P Cleaner
Further
Process
G-P Cleaner
Further
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
*$210,000 ÷ 5 years = $42,000
Revenues ($360,000 X 4 yrs.)
Selling and administrative
Less: Loss on old equipment
Net
Income
Increase
(Decrease)
PROBLEM 7-4B (Continued)
(d) MEMO
TO: Gene Simmons
FROM: Student
When deciding whether or not to replace any old equipment, the analysis
should only include cost data relevant to the replacement decision. The
$110,000 loss that would be experienced if we replace the old equipment
expensed under either alternative, making it irrelevant.
Sales
Variable expenses
Cost of goods sold
Selling and administrative
Total variable expenses
Contribution margin
$310,000
189,000
45,000
234,000
$ 76,000
$170,000
140,400
49,000
189,400
($ (19,400)
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Contribution margin (above)
Fixed expenses
Cost of goods sold
Selling and administrative
Total fixed expenses
Income (loss) from operations
$ 76,000
81,000
30,000
111,000
($(35,000)
$ 0
(40,500
15,000
55,500
$(55,500)
$(76,000)
40,500
15,000
55,500
$(20,500)
Net Income
Increase
(Decrease)
Contribution margin (above)
Fixed expenses
Cost of goods sold
Selling and administrative
Total fixed expenses
Income (loss) from operations
$(19,400)
(15,600)
21,000)
36,600)
$(56,000)
$ 0
7,800
10,500
18,300
$(18,300)
$19,400
7,800
10,500
18,300
$37,700
Division III is eliminated.
Division IV should be eliminated because it is producing negative con–
tribution margin ($19,400). Income from operations will increase $37,700
by discontinuing this division.
PROBLEM 7-5B (Continued)
(c) PANDA COMPANY
CVP Income Statement
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
Sales
Variable expenses
Cost of goods sold
Selling and
administrative
Total variable
expenses
Contribution margin
Fixed expenses
Cost of goods sold (1)
Selling and
administrative (2)
Total fixed
expenses
Income (loss) from operations
$510,000
210,000
24,000
234,000
276,000
92,600
39,500
132,100
$143,900
$400,000
200,000
40,000
240,000
160,000
52,600
43,500
96,100
$ 63,900
$310,000
189,000
45,000
234,000
76,000
83,600
33,500
117,100
$ (41,100
$1,220,000
599,000
109,000
708,000
512,000
228,800
116,500
345,300
$ 166,700
$7,800]. Each division’s share is $2,600.
(2) Division’s fixed selling and administrative expenses plus 1/3 of
BYP 7-1 DECISION-MAKING AT CURRENT DESIGNS
Situation #1
calculations:
Net Income
Increase (Decrease)
*(100 X $250)
**(($80 + $60 + $20) X 100) + ($1,000 + $2,000)
operating at full capacity, would be the lost contribution margin from
regular sales given up in order to fulfill the special order. Alternatively,
rather than reject the special order, it might consider temporarily expand–