(b) In 2013 the number of units produced and sold were equal. When this
occurs variable costing and absorption costing provide the same
results. Thus, in 2013, net income under variable costing would have
been $300,000. In 2014, units produced exceeded units sold by 5,000
would equal its 2013 income of $300,000.
(c) In part (b) it was determined that the division’s net income would have
been $300,000 in 2014 under variable costing. Since this is the same as
2013 net income, Brett would not receive a bonus.
“stock–outs.” If that was the case, there would be options available
to the company other than totally giving up on just–in-time practices. In
order to eliminate any potential conflicts of interest between Brett and
the company, and to ensure that his actions are in the best interest of the
for other internal management decision making.