Chapter Five: The Human Side of Business Research: Organizational and Ethical Issues 55
3. Time – Mr. Big wants a comprehensive research project completed in a very short period of
time, which could cause problems for Barton because good research takes time to plan and
implement.
4. Intuitive decision making – Mr. Big has already made his decision and wants Barton to
provide research to support that decision.
Students’ responses regarding whether or not Barton should get involved with this research will
vary. One of the rights and obligations of the researcher that seems to be relevant to this case is
objectivity, which might not be possible given the direction Mr. Big wants the research to take.
Another is confidentiality. If Barton’s firm has conducted research for a competitor, an ethical
dilemma will result because he must maintain client confidentiality and not share what he knows
with Mr. Big. Information about Barton’s family will likely play in students’ answers.
CASE 4.2 Big Brother Is Watching?
Objective: To encourage students to think about the ethical issues surrounding individuals’
privacy and the impact on research.
Summary: Technology is making our behavior more and more difficult to keep secret. Mobile
phones, RFID tags and GPS (Global Positioning Satellite) devices are ways that your location and
movements might be tracked. While legitimate use of this type of technology exist and may
assist in easing traffic patterns and provide better locations for retail establishments, at what point
does the collection of such information become a concern?
Question
Suppose a GIS research firm is approached by the state legislature and asked to provide data
about vehicle movement within the state for all cars with a satellite tracking mechanism. Based
on the movement of the cars over a certain time, the police can decide when a car was speeding.
They intend on using this data to send speeding tickets to those who moved too far, too fast. If
you are the research firm, would you supply the data? Discuss the ethical implications of the
decision.
This question brings up two points: the rights of participants and the obligation of the researcher.
Participants have a right to privacy, and in this case, a GIS research firm is collecting data from
respondents passively. If this information is to be shared with a third party (i.e., the government)
a specific consent agreement is needed. The other point is that researchers have an obligation of
confidentiality, which comes into play in several ways. The researcher often is obligated to
protect the confidentiality of both the research sponsor and the research participant.
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or
duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.