I. OBJECTIVES:
To help a student group of two to four students critically analyze a human resource system or
subsystem, iden%fy problems, and recommend construc%ve improvements.
II. OUT-OF-CLASS PREPARATION TIME: 30 – 40 hours per group (10 – 15 hours per student) for a
total human resource system evaluation and 20-25 hours (5-10 hours per student) for a subsystem
evaluation.
III. IN-CLASS TIME SUGGESTED: None, unless an oral report is required by the instructor. In that
case, each group will make a 15-20 minuet presentation to the class.
IV. PROCEDURES: See text for detailed direction for either option 1 or option 2.
V. DISCUSSION:
The project focuses upon the selected organiza%on’s human-resource objectives, structures,
policies, practices, and selected administra%ve problems. It provides the student with the opportunity to
learn first hand about the human resource system of an actual organiza%on to develop field research
experience and evalua%ve skills. These skills should prove beneficial in future academic and professional
assignments. For the organization coopera%ng with the projects, the obvious bene5t is a free
consul%ng service with the possibility of improving eCciency/eFec%veness of their personnel systems.
The final report should be based upon the evaluation Guide in the text. Some of the section of
that Guide may be irrelevant to some organization. For example, the questions under the “Employee
Fric%ons” sec%on will be irrelevant for organization which are not unionized. Some other organization
may have unusual circumstances regarding human resources management which are not adequately
covered by the Guide. In this situation, the student should be encouraged to go beyond the Guide to
discuss which is important in the personnel process.
Each student group should assume the stance of an outside consultant who has been called in to
evaluate the human resource system or subsystem of the particular organiza%on. This information may
be gathered either through in-person interviews with human resources managers or through the
organization website at a minimum, that paper should reLect the items contained in section I, VII, and
one other part of the evaluation guide.
Possible criteria for the instructor’s evaluation of individual or group final reports are as follows: