II. OUT-OF-CLASS PREPARATION TIME: 10 minutes to read exercise and decide which employee
should be terminated.
III. IN-CLASS TIME SUGGESTED: 40-50 Minutes
IV. PROCEDURES: See Text
V. DISCUSSION:
There are two aspects of this exercise which are par cularly worthy of discussion:
1. What criteria did par cipants use in determining whom to terminate?
2. How e-ec vely was the termina on interview conducted?
The exercise provides many poten al criteria. Six are listed in Harvey’s evalua on: current
salary, work quality, work quan ty, knowledge of job, dependability, and coopera veness. In addi on,
the profile of each employee suggest many other poten al criteria including: age, race, marital status,
seniority, educa on, congeniality, willingness to work over me, loyalty, involvement in community
a-airs, absenteeism, physical condi on, and accuracy. As in most termina on decisions in industry,
par cipants need to consider a wide range of variables in making their decisions. While no par cular set
of criteria can be labeled as “correct,” the organiza on’s long range e-ec veness is the ul mate goal.
Several aspects of the decision making process can be discussed. First, which of the poten al
criteria did the par cipants even consider? Why? How, if at all, did par cipants rank order those they
did consider? Why? Second, how did the par cipants combine the criteria they considered important?
What weights did they aDach to each, either implicitly or explicitly? How did they determine these
weights? Third, in making their decision, did par cipants use a compensatory model, a disjunc ve
model, or a conjunc ve model?
While discussing the alterna ves, par cipants some mes want to avoid selec ng anyone to be
terminated. They conclude that no one should be fired and that, instead, some other solu on is
appropriate (e.g. reducing everyone’s work hours, gran ng more vaca on me, crea ng new posi ons,
or wai ng for natural aDri on to occur). Faculty members can either inform the group that this answer
is unacceptable and that they must pick an employee to terminate or can let the group’s answer serve as
a basis for discussing alterna ves to termina on.
In discussing whom they will 8re, par cipants also frequently consider how easy or hard it will
be to conduct a discharge interview with a given employee. Par cipants should realize that this prac cal
issue cons tutes a very real criterion that some managers use in determining whom they will discharge.
Even though it is a criterion just as is work quan ty, work quality, etc., it is oTen not recognized as such.
One other aspect of this exercise that could be discussed is the legal issues that might surface if
par cular individuals are terminated. For example, if Mr. Pope is terminated, would the firm be found
guilty of viola ng the Age Discrimina on in Employment Act?