6 % Part I: The Need for Rhe toric and Writing [ 91 ]
students have ever actually considered the idea of rhe toric in a positive light; most
are much more familiar with negative terms such as “empty rhe toric.” Beginning
with Booth offers an opportunity to defi ne rhe toric positively as the art, theory, and
what others are saying if you don’t really and truly hear them. And that calls for
rhetorical listening. Asked to notice their own listening habits, many students
will admit that they don’t listen well and that they are usually thinking more
about what they will say than about what the other person is saying.
Krista Ratcliffe offers an example from her own teaching that helped her
defi ne rhetorical listening. In a discussion about Cornel West’s book Race Matters,
one student compared his own experience of race to the way West describes the
experience to be for some African Americans by saying, “I don’t look at myself in
the mirror and think, ‘I’m a white guy.’ I just don’t. I don’t even think about it.”
So it’s worth taking time in class to stop and observe, and to ask students to
observe themselves, and those around them, listening: what are the signals of good
rhetorical listening? How do we know when someone is really listening to us? How
can we be better listeners? You might ask students to make some notes on their
own practices, then have a class discussion about a contentious issue and follow it
with a debriefi ng about how well each person listened and what they understood
from the discussion.
For an exercise to help your students Think beyond Words, have them watch the
ad shown on p. 12, and ask them to think about what kind of rhetorical thinking
the ad writers did— who was their target audience, and how did they go about
appealing to them? If they were to write an ad for a car (or something else), what
words would they use, and why? You might also ask students to look very care-
On pp. 15–16, you’ll fi nd another reference to Wayne Booth: his brief analy sis
of how scientists James Watson and Francis Crick were thinking rhetorically when