Chapter 16 39
Chapter 16
Equilibrium
Some people have suggested that it would make more sense to save this
chapter until after deriving supply curves, but I still feel that it is in a better
position here. After all, the students have seen labor supply curves and net
supply curves earlier in the course, and it isn’t any shock to see demand and
supply treated together now.
The first part of the chapter is pretty standard, although I go to extra pains
to be clear to emphasize the idea of the inverse demand and supply curves. I tell
the students that the inverse functions describe the same relationship, but just
from a different viewpoint.
The treatment of taxes is more thorough than is usually the case. I like
the idea of looking at taxation in several different ways. It is a good idea to
emphasize that there are really four different variables in a taxation problem:
the demand price pd, the supply price ps, the amount demanded qd,andthe
amount supplied qs. When confronted with a tax problem, the first thing you
should do is write down the relationships between these four variables.
The most typical set of relationships is
pd=ps+t
qd=qs
But other relationships are possible. For example, if a tax-in-kind is levied,
as in the King Kanuta problem in the workbook, then the amount demanded
will be different than the amount supplied. In fact the only systematic way to
work out the King Kanuta problme is to be very careful about writing down the
relationships among the four variables.
You should emphasize that the incidence of the tax doesn’t depend on the
legal requirements of who is responsible for paying the tax. The Social Security
tax is a really nice example for this. The Social Security tax is based on 15% of
the nominal wage. The employer “pays” half of the tax and the worker “pays”
the other half. But of course, this is a fiction. Show the students how we could
redefine the nominal wage so that the worker paid all the tax or the employer
paid all the tax, and leave the take-home pay of the worker unchanged.
This leads naturally to a discussion of the real incidence of a tax, the ideas
of “passing along a tax,” and so on.