26 Chapter Highlights
Chapter 10
Intertemporal Choice
This is one of my favorite topics, since it uses consumer theory in such
fundamental ways, and yet has many important and practical consequences.
The intertemporal budget constraint is pretty straightforward. I sometimes
draw the kinked shape that results from different borrowing and lending rates,
just to drive the point home. It is good to spell out the importance of convexity
and monotonicity for intertemporal preferences. Ask your students what savings
behavior would be exhibited by a person with convex intertemporal preferences.
The difference between the present value and the future value formulation of
the budget constraint can be seen as a choice of numeraire.
The comparative statics is simply relabeled graphs we’ve seen before, but it
is still worth describing in detail as a concrete example.
I think that it is worth repeating the conclusion of Section 10.6 several times,
as students seem to have a hard time absorbing it. An investment that shifts
the endowment in a way that increases its present value is an investment that
every consumer must prefer (as long as they can borrow and lend at the same
interest rate). It is a good idea to express this point in several different ways.
One especially important way is to talk explicitly about investments as changes
in the endowment (Δm1,Δm2), and then point out that any investment with a
positive net present value is worthwhile.
Emphasize that present value is really a linear operation, despite appearances.
Given a table of present values, as Table 11.1, show how easy it is to calculate
present values.
The installment loan example is a very nice one. It is good to motivate it by
first considering a person who borrows $1,000 and then pays back $1,200 a year
later. What rate of interest is he paying? Show that this rate can be found by
solving the equation
1000(1 + r) = 1200,
which can be written as
1000 = 1200
1+r.