In e qual ity and Poverty | 39
great differences. More recent econometric tests show no relationship between
in e qual ity and growth. Therefore, rising in e qual ity is not an inevitable con-
comitant of development. Differences in in e qual ity have been attributed to
factors such as education, population growth, the structure of asset own ership,
and control by entrenched elites. On balance, the determinants of income
in e qual ity are not well understood. In e qual ity matters because the poor may
be credit– constrained or may not be po liti cally connected.
IV. Looking at poverty, the empirical pattern is clear and simple: Poverty is
diminishing in countries that are growing rapidly, while in the absence of
economic growth rising poverty is virtually unavoidable.
V. The chapter contrasts the two broad strategies of growth as good and growth
not being good enough. It describes the role of the Washington Consensus and
its impact on poverty. It suggests some methods of poverty intervention such
as improving opportunities and providing income transfers and safety nets.
The chapter closes by exploring the pop u lar issue of global income in e qual ity
and shows how conclusions depend on the chosen unit of mea sure ment. It
also provides Sachs’s arguments for The End of Poverty.
Boxed Examples
Box 6–1: National Poverty Lines in Bangladesh, Mexico, and the United
States
Box 6– 2: Who Is Not Poor?
Box 6– 3: Why Should Development Strategies Have a Poverty Focus?
There are three boxed examples. The rst study compares the national poverty
lines of Bangladesh, Mexico, and the United States. The second example pro-
vides Lant Pritchett’s dissension on the global poverty line of a “$1.25 a day.” The
nal example describes an interview with Dani Rodrik, who explains why devel-
opment strategies should be poverty focused.
In the New Edition
The seventh edition of this chapter updates the analysis of in e qual ity and poverty
by examining the revision of the global poverty line from $1 per day to $1.25 per
day. Combined with recent mea sures of PPP, the latest estimates on levels of both
in e qual ity and poverty are presented. A new section, “Living in Poverty,” includes
insights from the work by economists Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Du o, and others
about the economic lives of the poor. The use of conditional cash transfers also
receives more attention.