Agriculture and Development | 113
This is followed by a review of an extension of the two– sector model pro–
posed by economists Mukesh Eswaran and Ashok Kotwal.
IV. The fourth important aspect of this chapter examines the deeper questions of
how structural transformation happens and what role agricultural growth plays
in the pro cess. This can only be assessed by examining intersectoral linkages
in more detail. The Lewis and Fei- Ranis models are analyzed in the context of
linkage, followed by those of Albert Hirschman. By the early 1960s, econo–
mists’ perspectives had evolved on intersectoral linkages and agriculture’s
potential contributions to growth. This led to the argument of indirect linkages
developed by Bruce Johnston and John Mellor. Their arguments led to the intro–
duction of growth multipliers— which sought to mea sure agriculture’s contri-
butions to growth. This section concludes with a review of stability linkage at
the macroeconomic level and its impact on po liti cal and economic stability.
V. The fth section of the chapter discusses agriculture and poverty alleviation.
Here the authors argue that, on average, agricultural growth is more effective
in reducing poverty than is industrial growth. This conclusion is reached by
examining the staggering numbers of the very poor who are disproportion-
ately concentrated in rural areas. Evidence to support this conclusion is backed
by the World Bank’s World Development Report, 2008. It concludes by look–
ing at different countries and how the unique characteristics of each could
dictate the road a nation takes to improving itself and the lives of its people.
Boxed Examples
Box 16– 1: Surplus Labor in China
Box 16–2: Debates over Surplus Labor
Box 16– 3: The Nutrition Linkage to Economic Growth
The rst box examines China’s problem as a labor– surplus country to 1978. It
further discusses how the government assisted in accelerating the transfer of
workers from agricultural to urban employment and discusses migration from the
rural to the urban sector. The second box contrasts the debate over surplus labor