Quick search
Join
Home
>
Solution Manual
>
978-0134731889 Excel Figures 5 – 9 To 5 – 12
Sidebar
Close
978-0134731889 Excel Figures 5 – 9 To 5 – 12
0
Helpful
0
Unhelpful
January 8, 2021
Related documents
Econ 120 Practice Test Answers
Chapter 1 Business And Its Environment
Sociology
Wow My Love
Case Report Laquinta
Article Review: Administrators and Accountability: The Plurality of Value Systems in the Public Domain
FC 42957
FC 62472
FIN 91396
FE 34842
Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Table 5-2 HighOptic
Inputs – Costs, Capacities, Demands (HighOp
tic)
Fixed
Capa-
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver Omaha
Portland
Cost ($)
city
Baltimore
1,675
400
685
1,630
1,160
2,800
7,650
18
Chey
enne
1,460
1,940
970
100
495
1,200
3,500
24
Salt Lake
1,925
2,400
1,425
500
950
800
5,000
27
Memphis
380
1,355
543
1,045
665
2,321
4,100
22
W
ichita
922
1,646
700
508
311
1,797
2,200
31
Demand
10
8
14
6 7
11
Decision Variables
Plants
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland (1=open)
Baltimore
0 0
0
0 0
0
Chey
enne
0 0
0
6 7
0
1
Salt Lake
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
Memphis
0 0
0
0 0
0
W
ichita
0 0
0
0 0
0
Constraints
Supply City
Excess Capacity
Baltimore
18
Chey
enne
11
Salt Lake
16
Memphis
22
W
ichita
31
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver Omaha
Portland
Unmet Demand
10
8
14
0 0
0
Objective Function
Cost =
21,365
$
Demand City
Production and Transportation Cost p
er 1000 Units
Demand City – Production Al
location (1000 Units)
Optimal Demand
Allocation fo
r HighOptic (part o
f Table 5-
2)
Table 5-2 Telecom
One
Inputs – Costs, Capacities, Demands (TelecomOne)
Fixed
Capa-
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
Cost ($)
city
Baltimore
1,675
400
685
1,630
1,160
2,800
7,650
18
Chey
enne
1,460
1,940
970
100
495
1,200
3,500
24
Salt Lake
1,925
2,400
1,425
500
950
800
5,000
27
Memphis
380
1,355
543
1,045
665
2,321
4,100
22
W
ichita
922
1,646
700
508
311
1,797
2,200
31
Demand
10
8
14
6 7
11
Decision Variables
Plants
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Om
aha
Portland (1=open)
Baltimore
0 8 2
0 0
0
1
Chey
enne
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
Salt Lake
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Memphis
10
0
12
0 0
0
1
W
ichita
0 0 0
0 0
0
1
Constraints
Supply City
Excess Capacity
Baltimore 8
Chey
enne
24
Salt Lake
27
Memphis 0
W
ichita
31
Atlanta
Boston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
Unmet Demand
000 67
11
Objective Function
Cost =
28,836
$
Demand City
Production and Transportation Cost p
er 1000 Units
Demand City – Production Al
location (1000 Units)
Optimal Demand Allocation fo
r Telec
omOne (part of Table
5
–
2)
Merged Network with Al
l Plants
Inputs – Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOp
tic)
Fixed
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
Cost ($)
Capacity
Baltimore
1,675
400
685
1,630
1,160
2,800
7,650
18
Chey
enne
1,460
1,940
970
100
495
1,200
3,500
24
Salt Lake
1,925
2,400
1,425
500
950
800
5,000
27
Memphis
380
1,355
543
1,045
665
2,321
4,100
22
W
ichita
922
1,646
700
508
311
1,797
2,200
31
Demand
10
8
14
6
7
11
Decision Variables
Plants
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Om
aha
Portland (1=op
en)
Baltimore
0 8 2 0
0
0
1
Chey
enne
0 0 0 6
0
0
1
Salt Lake
0
0
0
0
0
11
1
Memphis
10
0
12
0
0
0 1
W
ichita
0 0 0 0
7
0
1
Constraints
Supply City
Excess Capacity
Baltimore
8
Total Availab
le Capacity
122
Chey
enne
18
Salt Lake
16
Memphis 0
W
ichita
24
Objective Function
Cost =
48,913
$
Demand City
Production and Transportation Cost p
er 1000 Units
Demand City – Production Al
location (1000 Units)
Figure 5-12
Inputs – Costs, Capac
ities, Dema
nds (for TelecomOptic)
Fixed
Supply City
Atlanta
Bo
ston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Po
rtland
Cost ($)
Capacity
Baltimore 1,67
5
400
685
1,630
1,160
2,800
7,650
18
Cheye
nne 1,46
0
1,940
970
100
495
1,2
00
3,500
24
Salt Lake
1,925
2,400
1,425
500
950
800
5,000
27
Memphis
380
1,355
543
1,045
665
2,321
4,100
22
W
ichita
922
1,646
700
508
311
1,797
2,200
31
Demand
10
8
14
6 7
11
Decision V
ariables
Plants
Supply City
Atlanta
Bo
ston
Ch
icago
Denver
Omaha
Portland (1=op
en)
Baltimore
0 8 2 0 0
0
1
Cheye
nne
0 0 0 6 7
11
1
Salt Lake
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Memphis
10
0
12
0 0
0
1
W
ichita
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Constraints
Supply City
Excess Capacity
Baltimore 8
Cheye
nne 0
Salt Lake
0
Memphis 0
W
ichita 0
Atlanta
Bo
ston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
Demand City
Production
and Tran
sportation Co
st per 10
00 Units
Demand City – P
roduction A
llocation (100
0 Units)
Figure 5-12
Observe that the plants
in Wichita and Salt lake are shut to further lower cost relative
to keeping all plants open.
Table 5-3 Single Sou
rcing
Inputs – Costs, Capacities, Demands (Table 11.4 for TelecomOptic)
Fixed
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
Cost ($)
Capacity
Baltimore
1,675
400
685
1,630
1,160
2,800
7,650
18
Chey
enne
1,460
1,940
970
100
495
1,200
3,500
24
Salt Lake
1,925
2,400
1,425
500
950
800
5,000
27
Memphis
380
1,355
543
1,045
665
2,321
4,100
22
W
ichita
922
1,646
700
508
311
1,797
2,200
31
Demand
10
8
14
6 7
11
Decision Variables
Plants
Supply City
Atlanta
Boston Chicago
Denver
Omaha
Portland
(1=open)
Baltimore
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Chey
enne
0 0 0 0 0
0
0
Resulting Production Allocation
Objective Function
Cost =
49,717
$
Demand City
Production and Transportation Cost p
er 1000 Units
Demand City Suppli
ed (1 indicates Cities Sup
plied)