Chapter 9 Foundations of Group Behavior Page
groups whose status criteria are different, or when they join groups whose
members have heterogeneous backgrounds.
their companies as determinants of status.
ii. Government bureaucrats may use the size of their budgets, and
blue-collar workers years of seniority.
attempts to reconcile the differing hierarchies.
i. As we’ll see in Chapter 10, this can be a problem when management
creates teams of employees from varied functions.
6. Status and stigmatization
others with their stigma.
i. This “stigma by association” effect can result in negative opinions and
C. Group Property 4: Size
1. The size of a group affects the group’s overall behavior, but the effect depends
on the dependent variables.
input.
b. Smaller groups—seven members—are better at doing something
productive with that input.
2. Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when
working collectively than when working individually.
a. Causes of social loafing
i. A belief that others in the group are not carrying their fair share.
their contribution cannot be measured.
b. Social loafing appears to have a Western bias.
i. It’s consistent with individualistic cultures, such as the United States
and Canada that are dominated by self-interest.
ii. It is not consistent with collective societies, in which individuals are
motivated by group goals.
c. Preventing social loafing
i. Set group goals, so the group has a common purpose to strive toward.
ii. Increase intergroup competition, which again focuses on the shared
290