PART III
CASE SOLUTIONS
CASE 13-1: CHIPPY POTATO CHIP COMPANY
Note: Because motor freight classifications are not static, but change over time, it is suggested that
Freight Classification (NMFC).
Question 1: If you worked for Chippy, what new classification would you ask for? Give your reasons.
As of 2016, the NMFC indicated that absent any unusual or significant stowability, handling, or
liability characteristics, density is of prime importance in the assignment of classes. The old-style chips
Moreover, the relatively low value per pound of the product (less than $2.00) qualifies for a
classification of 55. However, this value per pound classification doesn’t consider potential liability
Thus, there is ample evidence that Chippy can argue for, and support, a lower classification for its
Question 2: Classifications are based on both cost and value of service. From the carriers’ standpoint,
how has cost of service changed?
At a minimum, the cost of service is changed in the sense that the increased density per cubic foot
service might also change because the tubular containers may result in less product damage.
Question 3: Given the existing LTL classification of 200, how has value of service to the customer
changed?
Because the tubular containers may result in less product damage, the value of service to the customer
may change. On the other hand, the value of service appears to be negatively impacted in that
Question 4: The new tubular containers are much sturdier. If you worked for Chippy, how—if at all—