978-0134476308 Chapter 1

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 12
subject Words 6430
subject Authors Chad J. Zutter, Scott B. Smart

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
Part 1
Introduction to Managerial Finance
Chapters in This Part
Chapter 1 The Role of Managerial Finance
Chapter 2 The Financial Market Environment
page-pf2
Chapter 1
The Role of Managerial Finance
Instructor’s Resources
Chapter Overview
This chapter introduces the field of finance through building-block terms and concepts. The discussion starts by
defining “firm” and stressing its principal goal—maximizing shareholder wealth. The importance of focusing on
shareholders rather than stakeholders broadly and stock price rather than current profits is explained. The
managerial-finance function is then described and differentiated from economics and accounting, with special
attention to the role ethics play in a financial manager’s efforts to maximize the firm’s stock price. Next, the
three basic legal forms of business organization (sole proprietorship, partnership, and corporation) are
discussed and the strengths and weaknesses of each form noted. The chapter concludes with an exploration of
the agency problem—the conflict arising when the managers and owners of the firm are not the same
people—and the private- and public-sector tools available to focus managerial attention on shareholder
NOTE: After this text went to press, Congress passed the Tax Cuts and Job Act of 2017, which dramatically
changed both corporate and personal tax rates. The first printing of this text did not reflect these tax changes,
but subsequent print runs do. For tax-related problems below, we provide solutions under both the old and the
new tax law. Of particular relevance to this chapter, the corporate tax rate is now a flat 21%. Individuals still
face a progressive rate schedule, so there is still value in explaining the progressive nature of the old corporate
structure as well as the difference between marginal and average tax rates (which are essentially the same
under a flat-rate structure). The change in the corporate tax code—in particular the introduction of a lower,
flatter rate—can serve as a useful discussion point throughout this text. For example, instructors may wish to
discuss the impact of a lower tax rate on the NPV of investments or a firm’s optimal capital structure.
Answers to Review Questions
1-1. The goal of a firm, and therefore of all financial managers, is maximizing shareholder wealth. The
proper metric for this goal is the price of the firm’s stock. Other things equal, an increasing price per
page-pf3
page-pf4
page-pf5
page-pf6
page-pf7
© 2019 Pearson Education, Inc.
E1-5. Agency costs (LG 6)
E1-6. Corporate tax liability (LG 5)
P1-1. Liability comparisons (LG 5; Basic)
a. Ms. Harper has unlimited personal liability, so she is liable for the firm’s $60,000 in unpaid debts.
page-pf8
page-pf9
© 2019 Pearson Education, Inc.
P1-5. Identifying agency problems, costs, and resolutions (LG 6; Intermediate)
a. The agency cost is wages paid to an idle employee whose responsibilities must be covered by
someone else. One solution is a time clock everyone must punch when arriving for work, take a
lunchbreak, and leave for the day. A punch clock would reduce agency costs by: (1) prompting
the receptionist to return from lunch on time or (2) reduce wages paid for unproductive time.
P1-6 Corporate taxes (LG 5; Basic)
a. Firm’s tax liability on $92,500 using Table 1.2:
Total taxes due = $13,750 + [0.34 × ($92,500 – $75,000)] = $13,750 + $5,950 = $19,700
For students with the text updated with the latest tax information, the taxes due would be 21% ×
page-pfa
page-pfb
© 2019 Pearson Education, Inc.
Average tax rate: $150,690 ÷ $500,000 = 30.1%
$1,000,000: Tax liability: $150,690 + [0.37 × ($1,000,000 – $500,000)] = $335,690
After-tax earnings: $1,000,000 – $335,690 = $664,310
Average tax rate: $335,690 ÷ $1,000,000 = 33.6%
$1,500,000: Tax liability: $150,690 + [0.37 × ($1,500,000 - $500,000)] = $520,690
page-pfc
page-pfd
page-pfe
page-pff
© 2019 Pearson Education, Inc.
P1-10 Interest vs. dividend expense (LG 6; Intermediate)
The following answer is appropriate for the original printing of the text with old tax information.
Answers for the printing with updated tax information follow.
a. EBIT $50,000
Less: Interest expense 12,000
P1-11. Reducing tax exposure—Hemingway Corporation (LG 5; Intermediate)
a. With pre-tax income currently of $200,000, Hemingway’s current tax liability (using the tax rates
in Table 1.2) is $22,250 + 0.39 × ($200,000 - $100,000) = $22,250 + $39,000 = $61,250. Or using
the newer tax code reflecting the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the company faces a 21% flat tax, so its
tax bill is currently 21% × $200,000 = $42,000.
page-pf10
© 2019 Pearson Education, Inc.
$280,000. Taxes owed will equal $22,250 + 0.39 × (280,000 - $100,000) = $92,450. The new average
tax rate will be $92,450 / $280,000 = 0.330 or 33.0%. The average tax rate is higher than in part b,
again because added income from expansion is taxed at the marginal rate of 39%. However, the
average tax rate here is lower than in part c because Hemingway’s interest payments reduce its overall
tax bill and, hence, its average tax rate. Put another way, with debt financing, less of the additional
P1-12. Ethics problem (LG 2)
Maximizing shareholder wealth subject to “ethical constraints” means pursuing all opportunities to
boost stock price consistent with community ethical norms and applicable federal/state laws.
“Community ethical norms” refers to prevailing standards about right and wrong. Consistent,
knowing violation of such norms can reduce shareholder wealth by prompting stakeholder backlash
and punitive government action. For example, in 2017 sexual mistreatment of women in the
workplace became an overriding concern for many Americans. Firms with executives guilty of
harassing female subordinates were vulnerable to attacks by customers, employees, lawyers, the
media, and elected officials. If a firm knew an executive had a history of inappropriate behavior and
took no action (believing, perhaps, the executive was irreplaceable), the backlash was even worse
when the story inevitably came out. As a result, many high-profile executives were fired to head off
customer boycotts, employee defections, hostile-workplace lawsuits, and political retaliation (such as
Congressional hearings or targeted legislation) that could hammer the firm’s stock price. Similarly,
abiding by applicable federal and state laws protects shareholders wealth from punitive legal action
against the firm and its executives as well as backlash from stakeholders and elected officials.
Case
page-pf11
page-pf12

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.