Assumptions Value Growth Assumptions Value
Light bulb export volume to Argentina, per year 24,000 4.00% Sales multiple in year 5 6.00
Sales price per set in Argentina 60.00$ 7.00% Spot rate, 2003 (Pesos/US$) 3.50
Material costs per set in Argentina 20.00$ 6.00% US inflation rate, per annum 1.00%
Material and shipping costs of imports per set 10.00$ 0.00% Argentine inflation rate, per annum 5.00%
Direct & indirect cost per set 5.00$ 0.00% Discount rate in United States 18.00%
Depreciable investment (buildings & equipment) 1,000,000$
Initial investment in net working capital 1,000,000$
Discount rate in Argentina 20.00%
Year 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
PPP Expected Exchange Rate (Pesos/US$) 3.50 3.64 3.78 3.93 4.09 4.25
Project Cash Flows in Argentina: Project Viewpoint (Argentine pesos)
Annual units sold (sets) 24,000 24,960 25,958 26,997 28,077
Sales price in Argentina per set (in US$) 60.00$ 64.20$ 68.69$ 73.50$ 78.65$
Sales price in Argentine per set (in pesos) 218.32 242.85 270.14 300.50 334.27
Sales revenue (Argentine pesos) 5,239,604 6,061,547 7,012,430 8,112,479 9,385,094
Less direct manufacturing and shipping costs (1,746,535) (2,001,632) (2,293,990) (2,629,048) (3,013,046)
Less cost of US components @ $10/set (873,267) (944,166) (1,020,821) (1,103,700) (1,193,307)
Gross profit 2,619,802 3,115,749 3,697,619 4,379,731 5,178,741
Less depreciation (700,000) (700,000) (700,000) (700,000) (700,000)
Pre-tax profit 1,919,802 2,415,749 2,997,619 3,679,731 4,478,741
Less 40% Argentine taxes 40% (767,921) (966,299) (1,199,048) (1,471,892) (1,791,496)
Net income 1,151,881 1,449,449 1,798,571 2,207,838 2,687,245
Add back depreciation 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000 700,000
Annual project cash flow 1,851,881 2,149,449 2,498,571 2,907,838 3,387,245
Sales value in year 5 (multiple of earnings) 16,123,468
Initial investment, total (7,000,000)
Free cash flow for discounting (pesos) (7,000,000) 1,851,881 2,149,449 2,498,571 2,907,838 19,510,713
Internal rate of return (IRR) 43.9%
Net present value (NPV) 6,725,072
The Parent Viewpoint needs to consider all incremental cash flow impacts including loss on export sales to Argentina (current practice).
Cash Flows to Hermosa in US: Parent Viewpoint
Sales revenue on exports to Argentina 240,000$ 249,600$ 259,584$ 269,967$ 280,766$
Less direct and indirect costs on exported sets (120,000) (124,800) (129,792) (134,984) (140,383)
Profit on Hermosa’s component sales 120,000$ 124,800$ 129,792$ 134,984$ 140,383$
Less US taxes on component profits @ 40% 40% (48,000) (49,920) (51,917) (53,993) (56,153)
a) Net profit on component sales after-tax 72,000$ 74,880$ 77,875$ 80,990$ 84,230$
b) Cash flow from Argentina to Hermosa (US) 508,952$ 568,229$ 635,360$ 711,263$ 796,964$
Cash flow loss on Hermosa’s loss of exports (480,000) (499,200) (519,168) (539,935) (561,532)
Less US taxes on export losses 40% 192,000 199,680 207,667 215,974 224,613
c) Net cash flow reduction after-tax (288,000)$ (299,520)$ (311,501)$ (323,961)$ (336,919)$
d) Cash flow from sale of Argentine subsidiary (not taxed) 3,793,593$
Total parent cash flow, after-tax (a+b+c+d) 292,952 343,589 401,735 468,293 4,337,868
Initial investment (2,000,000)
Free cash flow to parent for discounting (2,000,000)$ 292,952$ 343,589$ 401,735$ 468,293$ 4,337,868$
Internal rate of return (IRR) 29.1%
Net present value (NPV) 684,343
Problem 18.10 Hermosa Components: Revenue Growth, Sales Price and Currency Risk Scenario
Melinda Deane, a new analysts at Hermosa and a recent MBA graduate, believes that it is a fundamental error to evaluate the Argentine project’s prospective earnings and
cash flows in dollars, rather than first estimating their Argentine peso (Ps) value and then converting cash flow returns to the U.S. in dollars. She believes the correct
method is to use the end-of-year spot rate in 2012 of Ps3.50/$ and assume it will change in relation to purchasing power. (She is assuming U.S. inflation to be 1% per
annum, Argentine inflation to be 5% per annum). She also believes that Hermosa should use a risk-adjusted discount rate in Argentina which reflects Argentine capital
costs (20% is her estimate) and a risk-adjusted discount rate for the parent viewpoint capital budget (18%) on the assumption that international projects in a risky currency
environment should require a higher expected return than other lower risk projects. How do these assumptions and changes alter Hermosa’s perspective on the proposed
investment?