variables as nominal, ordinal, or scale, it “knows” the scaling assumptions of the
variables and therefore will perform the correct descriptive analysis. This assumption
is not true as the only relevance of the measurement indication is in SPSS chart
procedures where nominal and ordinal variables are treated as categorical.
3. The use of descriptive statistics can be illustrated effectively by using a research
report. Make PowerPoint presentation files or Word files of the questionnaire used in
the study, and have students identify the scaling assumptions and appropriate
descriptive statistics for various questions. Then show the tables in the report that
communicate the findings. With a multimedia teaching platform, instructors can
perform the descriptive statistics with SPSS, illustrating both the cursor movements
and SPSS output.
4. Instructors who want a different data set or who want to have students learn firsthand
how to build an SPSS data set might consider this suggestion. Have the class identify
a topic of interest pertaining to the university and design a self-administered
questionnaire. Design the SPSS template for data entry by entering in variable names
and value labels. Distribute the SPSS template file to students. Each student should
gather a set number of questionnaires and enter them into the SPSS template file and
save it as a unique name (such as lastname.sav). The files can be merged into a
master SPSS data file by using the “merge files” command on a master version of
SPSS. Note: The merge files command is not available on the student version of
SPSS. By spreading the data collection and data entry work across the class, a large
data set can be obtained quickly and efficiently.
5. Our new integrated case is AutoConcepts, and we have a complete SPSS data set for
examples in the text as well as exercises and an integrated case analysis task for each
6. The effect of sample size on a confidence interval can be demonstrated with a simple
spreadsheet program such as Excel or Lotus 1-2-3. Let’s assume that p has been
found to be 40%, what would be the confidence intervals under successively larger
sample sizes? The following table is a spreadsheet-like comparison for 95%
confidence intervals.