to children’s safety. Online predators and bullying are real safety issues facing youth. Other
criticisms of Facebook’s decision boil down to money—some argue that the change was just
about monetizing kids. Facebook can offer a younger demographic to advertisers wanting to
reach them. Facebook defended its actions saying the change in policy is due to teenagers
wanting the ability to post publically, primarily for fundraising and promoting extracurricular
activities such as sports and other school student organizations. Facebook has added precautions,
such as a pop-up warning before teens can post publically and making “seen only by friends” as
the default that must be changed if the teen desires posts to be public.
16.9. Is Facebook acting responsibly or merely trying to monetize kids as critics claim?
(AACSB: Communication; Ethical Reasoning)
Answer:
16.10. Come up with creative ways marketers can reach this demographic on Facebook without
alienating their parents. (AACSB: Communication; Reflective Thinking)
Answer:
Marketing Ethics: Pricey Deal?
Kmart offers a Lease-to-Own program targeted to low-income consumers and is taking some
heat over it. Rent-to-own is not new—chains such as Aaron’s and Rent-A-Center have been
around for years—but it is new that a mainstream retailer has moved into this market. Kmart’s
parent corporation, Sears Holdings, launched a similar program, and according to a company
executive, it is satisfying the unmet needs of new customers. Some critics say that it is just
encouraging instant gratification and exploiting disadvantaged consumers. These types of
customers don’t qualify for credit and don’t have enough cash to purchase desired products
outright, such as televisions and other big ticket items. However, a $300 TV purchased through
Kmart’s program ends up costing consumers $415 if purchased at the end of the lease. If
customers make just minimum payments over the course of the lease, one expert calculated, that
it is equivalent to charging a 117 percent annual interest rate. Sears’ spokespeople defend their
service as being better for consumers compared to other rent-to-own options because the retailer
does not markup the price of the product beyond the normal retail markup and limits the lease
period to 18 months, whereas other national rental chains’ prices are much higher and leases can
run two to four years.
16.11. Are Sears and Kmart exploiting disadvantaged consumers? Explain why or why not.
(AACSB: Communication; Ethical Reasoning)
Answer: