2-4. The Heritage Foundation’s Index of Economic Freedom is not the only ranking that assesses
countries in terms of successful economic policies. For example, the World Economic Forum
(WEF; www. weformum.org) publishes an annual Global Competitiveness Report; in the 2014-
2015 report, the United States ranks third, according to the WEF’s metrics. By contrast, Sweden
was in 10th place. According to the Index of Economic Freedom’s rankings the United States and
Sweden are in 12th and 23rd place, respectively. Why are the rankings so different? What
criteria does each index consider?
The Heritage foundation measures trade policy, taxation policy, government consumption
of economic output, monetary policy, capital flows and foreign investment, banking
On the other hand, the World Economic Forum, according to their website, states: “The
World Economic Forum is an independent, international organization incorporated as a
economic progress is not feasible. Our vision for the World Economic Forum is threefold.
Clearly, the WEF assigns a great deal of value to measuring the values and social
2-5. When the first edition of this textbook was published in 1996, the World Bank defined “low-
income country” as one with per capita income of less than $501. In 2003, when the third
edition of Global Marketing appeared, “low income” was defined as $785 or less in per capita
income. As shown in Table 2-4 of this chapter, $ 1,045 is the current “low income” threshold.
The other stages of development have been revised upward in a similar manner. How do you
explain the upward trend in the definition of income categories during the past 20 years?
The economic systems of countries are constantly developing and changes happen
rapidly. The percentage of the world’s GNI for low-income countries is now at a record