Personal Property and Bailment
shows. Smith testified that he knew that thieves are aware of jewelry trade shows and sometimes
Tunnel Car Wash, owned by Car Wash Headquarters, Inc. (CWH). At Rain Tunnel, the driver
leaves his or her vehicle with employees of the car wash, and the vehicle is sent through a wash
“tunnel.” Upon completion of the car wash cycle, an employee drives the vehicle to another area
of the car-wash premises to be hand dried. Once the vehicle is dried, the driver is signaled to
retrieve the vehicle.
about 15 minutes later by the police, the jewelry was gone.
Ziva Jewelry sued CWH to recover the value of the jewelry, alleging that a bailment had
been created between Ziva and CWH and that CWH, as the bailee, was negligent in not
protecting the bailed goods. CWH defended, arguing that no bailment was created and therefore it
responsibility for the jewelry hidden inside Smith’s trunk. Ziva Jewelry acknowledges that the
jewelry was not plainly visible; that its presence was not made known to the car-wash employees;
and that there was no reason that the employees should have expected expensive jewelry to be in
the trunk of Smith’s vehicle. Ziva Jewelry cannot claim that CWH knew or that it should have
bailment, the owner of the property is the bailor. The law of bailment establishes the rights,
duties, and liabilities of parties to a bailment. A bailment is different from a sale or a gift because
title to the goods does not transfer to the bailee. For a bailment to be created, it is important that
the bailee has exclusive control over the personal property and that the bailee knowingly accepts
not negligent.
Ordinary Bailments