Chapter 41
Circuit
Facts: Upon receiving news that Nvidea had been awarded the contract to develop a video game
console for Microsoft Corporation, Nvidea’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) sent a company–
wide e-mail late Sunday night announcing the contract award. The next morning, Nvidea sent a
number of follow-up e-mails advising Nvidea employees that the X-box information should be
kept confidential and imposing a trading blackout on the purchase of Nvidea stock by employees
purchased Nvidea stock. Bhagat denied telling anyone about the X-box contract before the
information was made public. There was no direct evidence that Bhagat contacted Gill prior to
Gill’s purchase of Nvidea stock. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigated
Bhagat’s and Gill’s purchases of Nvidea stock. Subsequently, the United States brought criminal
charges against Bhagat charging him with insider trading, tipping, and obstructing an SEC
investigation?
Decision: Yes. The U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the U.S. district court’s judgment finding
Bhagat criminally guilty of insider trading, tipping, and obstructing the SEC’s investigation. The
U.S. Court of Appeals remanded the case to the U.S. District Court for sentencing of Bhagat. To
convict Bhagat of insider trading, the government was required to prove that he traded stock on
the basis of material, nonpublic information. The government offered significant evidence to
conducting a proceeding; that the defendant was aware of that proceeding; and that the defendant
intentionally interfered with, or obstructed the course of, that proceeding.
Ethics Questions: Insider trading occurs when a company employee or company advisor uses
material nonpublic information to make a profit by trading in the securities of the company. This
practice is considered illegal because it allows insiders to take advantage of the investing public.
Case 41.2 Tipper-Tippee Liability: United States v. Kluger
722 F.3d 549, 2013 U.S. App. Lexis 13880 (2013), United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit
Facts: Three men (white-collar professionals) were engaged in an insider-trading ring which
yielded almost $50 million in profits. All three men were convicted and one, Kluger, received a