Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions
Once you have decided the contract is covered, what are the effects of having failed to reduce
it to writing? Several possibilities may occur at this juncture. The parties may proceed to
voluntarily perform the contract. But if one or both decide to assert the statute, its teeth are found
Once the contract is finally reduced to writing, the next element of the Statute of Frauds takes
hold: the parol evidence rule and the exceptions to it. Think of the parol evidence rule as being
similar to Janus, the figure from Roman mythology, who was the guardian of portals and patron
of beginnings and endings. He faced both ways at once, symbolizing his power to let in or keep
The converse is found in the exceptions to the parol evidence rule. Long ago, an anonymous
legal scholar first said: “The Statute of Frauds should not be used to perpetuate frauds.” The
exceptions to the parol evidence rule are designed to let in additional information not shown on
the original writing in certain limited circumstances. These special circumstances are grounded in
The second area of exception to the parol evidence rule is explaining ambiguities. If the
contract, as written, contains ambiguous language, parol evidence is allowable to clear the
ambiguity as long as it is consistent with the original terms. The nature of the evidence allowable
II. Chapter Objectives
1. List the contracts that must be in writing under the Statute of Frauds.
2. Explain the effect of noncompliance with the Statute of Frauds.
III. Key Question Checklist
Does the contract in question come under the writing requirements of the Statute of Frauds?
Is there an exception to the writing requirement?