24. Is This Sexual Harassment?
Since she has already responded positively to his invitations for drinks, he is
probably assuming that she is interested in pursuing a dating relationship and is
taking the next step. Currently, there is no harassment here. However, since he is her
boss, and has the power to fire, promote, and reward her performance, this is a
potentially problematic situation.
If things do not go well in the romantic relationship, the worker may claim that she
was forced into it to keep her job (quid pro quo), etc. On the other hand, if this liaison
goes well, once co-workers find out about the couple (and they almost always do),
they may perceive that Jeanne is receiving special treatment because she is dating the
boss. When workplace romances occur, it is best for one party to leave or to transfer
to another job where he or she is not supervised by the other partner.
6. Steve and Kathy – This can be a case of sexual harassment if Cathy has retaliated
against Steve for rejecting her romantic overtures (quid pro quo). However, nothing
is said here about his actual recent job performance. If she can document that it has
deteriorated, it may become a case of “he said” vs. “she said.” However, if his poor
performance appraisal resulted from the situation creating a hostile work
environment for him, or this is Cathy getting revenge for being rejected, he should
lodge a complaint against his supervisor. In any case, she should never have spoken
to him this way. This case also illustrates that ignoring harassing behavior seldom
solves the problem.
7. Jackie – The boss’ response may have been a conscious or unconscious response to
comfort a grieving employee. Since there is no evidence in the case, Jackie felt this
was a hostile environment and the boss’ behavior probably had no sexual intent, it is
not sexual harassment. The other employee reacted a bit too quickly by jumping to
conclusions.
8. Martin, Jacob, and Tina – Regardless of how attractive Tina is, Jacob is obligated
to take Martin’s complaint seriously. If she is creating a hostile environment for
Martin, this is sexual harassment. Martin was doing the right thing by informing his
supervisor that this attention is unwanted. When a supervisor brushes such a
complaint off, he is allowing the harasser to continue and this type of behavior can
lead to lawsuits.
9. Anna and Caitlin – In the U.S., standing closer than 18–20 inches from another
person at work is often interpreted as “an invasion of personal space.” However, in
some cultures, it is quite normal to stand much closer. So, it is possible that culture is
more of a factor here than Anna’s sexual orientation. In any case, there is no real
evidence here of sexual harassment. Caitlin should just tell Anna that she is crowding
her and that makes her a bit uncomfortable and she needs more space. It is quite
possible that Anna is completely unaware that she is doing this.