Chapter 18: Financial Regulation 107
banking crisis. The discussion in this chapter on the savings and loan and banking crisis of the 1980s is
very brief because it happened a long time ago. However, discussion of this episode is still relevant today
because many of the same forces that caused the banking and S&L crisis in the 1980s caused the recent
financial crisis as well as the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Chapter 26, which can be found on
the companion web site describes this episode in more detail and also has a detailed discussion of the
principal-agent problem and how it explains the political economy of the banking crisis. I believe this
material is worth teaching even though it is past history because discussion of this material is highly
stimulating to students and helps them understand how our political system affects our economic system.
Like all of us, students enjoy reading about scandals, which is why the Charles Keating story in that web
chapter makes the principal-agent problem come alive.
The chapter ends with a discussion of the Dodd-Frank bill and then the too-big-to–fail problem and future
regulation. Instead of lecturing on this issue, I have the students themselves speculate on whether the
Dodd-Frank bill solves the too-big-to-fail problem and whether it will prevent a crisis like the recent
global financial crisis from ever happening again. This gets them to apply the concepts in this chapter and
makes for a very spirited discussion.
Note that Chapter 7 does not need to be covered in order to teach this chapter. However, if Chapter 7 is
covered in class, Chapter 18 is a nice application of the analysis in that chapter. Indeed, the instructor
might want to stress in class the counterparts in private financial markets to the methods bank regulators
use to cope with adverse selection and moral hazard.
◼ Answers to End-of-Chapter Questions
2. There would be adverse selection because people who might want to burn their property for some
3. Chartering banks is the bank regulation that helps reduce the adverse selection problem because
4. Regulations that restrict banks from holding risky assets directly decrease the moral hazard of risk
taking by the bank. Requirements that force banks to have a large amount of capital also decrease the
5. The benefits of a too-big-to-fail policy are that it makes bank panics less likely. The costs are that
6. Because off-balance-sheet activities do not appear on bank balance sheets, they cannot be dealt
with by simple bank capital requirements, which are based on bank assets, such as a leverage ratio.