16.4 Exchange Rate Regimes and the International Financial System
(pages 497–513)
Learning Objective: Discuss the evolution of exchange rate regimes.
A. Fixed Exchange Rates and the Gold Standard
In the past, most exchange rate regimes were fixed exchange rate systems, in which exchange
rates were set at levels that were determined and maintained by governments. Under a gold
standard, currencies of participating countries are convertible into an agreed-upon amount of
gold. The gold standard had an automatic mechanism, called the price-specie-flow mechanism,
that caused exchange rates to reflect the underlying gold content of countries’ currencies. One
problem with the economic adjustment process under the gold standard was that countries with
trade deficits and gold outflows experienced declines in price levels, or deflation. Another
consequence of fixed exchange rates under the gold standard was that countries had little
control over their domestic monetary policies. The gold standard finally collapsed in the 1930s,
during the Great Depression.
Teaching Tips
The Making the Connection, “Did the Gold Standard Make the Depression Worse?” which begins on
page 501 of the text points out that during the Great Depression, countries that abandoned the gold
standard earlier experienced less severe economic contractions. Discussion of this topic can help students
understand the role that monetary policy can play in stimulating or hindering an economy during difficult
economic times. The Fed’s efforts to defend the value of the dollar by maintaining the gold standard
appear to have deepened the Great Depression. You can draw parallels to the state of the economy during
and following the financial crisis of 2007-2009 regarding the desirability of maintaining a strong currency
when the domestic economy is weak. You may be able to base another interesting classroom discussion
around whether or not the United States should consider returning to a gold standard.
B. Adapting Fixed Exchange Rates: The Bretton Woods System
Despite the gold standard’s demise, many countries remained interested in the concept of fixed
exchange rates. Under the Bretton Woods system, which was established in 1944, the
United States agreed to convert U.S. dollars into gold at a price of $35 per ounce—but only in
dealing with foreign central banks. The central banks of all other members of the system pledged to
buy and sell their currencies at fixed rates against the dollar. Under this system, exchange rates
were supposed to adjust only when a country experienced fundamental disequilibrium—that is,
persistent deficits or surpluses in its balance of payments at the fixed exchange rate. In
principle, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was to administer the Bretton Woods system and
to be a lender of last resort to ensure that short-term economic dislocations did not undermine the
stability of the fixed exchange rate system. In practice, the IMF—which survived the demise of the
Bretton Woods system—also encourages domestic economic policies that are consistent with
exchange rate stability and gathers and standardizes international economic and financial data to
use in monitoring member countries. There is some controversy among policymakers regarding the
role and actions of the IMF. Under the Bretton Woods system, a country could defend its fixed
exchange rate by buying or selling reserves or changing domestic economic policies, or it could
petition the IMF to be allowed to change its exchange rate. When investors came to believe that a
government was unable or unwilling to maintain its exchange rate, they attempted to profit by
selling a weak currency or buying a strong currency. These actions, known as speculative attacks,
could force a devaluation or revaluation of the currency. The system eventually collapsed because
the lack of U.S. commitment to price stability and the reluctance of other countries to revalue their
currencies against the dollar led to strong market pressures on fixed exchange rates.
C. Central Bank Interventions After Bretton Woods