97.5.
(2) W $20. w W/P $20/$2 10. Setting w MPN, 10 2(100 N), so 2N 190, so N 95.
5. (a) If the lump-sum tax is increased, there’s an income effect on labor supply, not a substitution
effect (since the real wage isn’t changed). An increase in the lump-sum tax reduces a worker’s
wealth, so labor supply increases.
(b) If T 35, then NS 22 12w (2 35) 92 12 w. Labor demand is given by
6. Since w 4.5 K0.5 N0.5, N0.5 4.5 K0.5/w, so N 20.25 K/w2. When K 25, N 506.25/w2.
(a) If t 0.0, then NS 100w2. Setting labor demand equal to labor supply gives 506.25/w2
100w2, so w4 5.0625, or w 1.5. Then NS 100 (1.5)2 225. [Check: N 506.25/1.52 225.]
Y 45N0.5 45(225)0.5 675. The total after-tax wage income of workers is (1 t) w NS 1.5
225 337.5.
(b) If t 0.6, then NS 100 [(1 0.6) w]2 16w2. The marginal product of labor is MPN
22.5/N0.5, so N 100 [(1 0.6) 22.5/N0.5]2, so N2 8100, so N 90. Then Y 45N0.5
45(90)0.5 426.91. Then w 22.5/900.5 2.37. The total after-tax wage income of workers is (1
t) w NS 0.4 2.37 90 85.38. Note that there’s a big decline in output and income,
22 400. Unemployment is 273.4. Income of workers is wN 2 126.6 253.2, which is lower
than without a minimum wage, because employment has declined so much.
7. (a) At any date, 25 people are unemployed: 5 who have lost their jobs at the start of the month and
20 who have lost their jobs either on January 1 or July 1. The unemployment rate is 25/500 5%.
(b) Each month, 5 people have one-month spells. Every six months, 20 people have six-month spells.
8. Number who become unemployed:
From not in the labor force: 3% of 88.3 million 2.649 million
From employed: 2% of 142.2 million 2.844 million
Total 5.493 million
Number who become employed: