Scott, Financial Accounting Theory, 7th Edition Instructor’s Solutions Manual Chapter 12
489
such as insider trading or failure to release information, from the financial press. The
assignment questions for this chapter contain examples of this type of article.
The 2007–2008 market meltdowns (Section 1.3) provide a more recent source of
discussion of the pros and cons of regulation. On the one hand, severe criticisms arose
concerning the adequacy of regulations of the financial industry and, closer to home,
those pertaining to fair value accounting. We now observe new regulations, some of
which are still in process, to increase regulation of banks and trading of derivatives. We
also observe aeveral new accounting standards (Sections 7.5 and 7.8), some of which
back off from fair value accounting for financial instruments. Whether or not these
regulations will reduce criticisms of accounting standards, and prevent recurrence of the
abuses leading up to the market meltdowns, remains to be seen.
2. To Conceptualize Ways in which Firms can Produce Information
Here, I treat information as a commodity, and draw an analogy with the production of
more conventional products. The idea is to get the students to think about both the
benefits and the costs of information production. Conceptually, one can then think, by
analogy with conventional microeconomic analysis, about “how much” information the
firm should produce.
It is worth pointing out that the definition of the socially best amount of information
production in the text is a strictly economic definition (see Section 12.4). The definition
ignores the distribution of information. However, this question is not avoided—it forms
the subject of Chapter 13.
Of course, information is a very complex commodity. I discuss briefly the three ways to
think about the quantity of information produced that are given in Section 12.3.
3. To Review Incentives for Firms to Produce Information
I emphasize the important point that, to a considerable extent, firms want to produce
information, without a regulator requiring them to do so. I divide these into contractual
and market–based reasons. For contracting, the parties want to produce information so
as to improve the efficiency of contracting. With respect to markets, the argument is