Financing
advising bank, assumes no liability for paying the letter of credit. Its only obligation is to ensure
that the beneficiary is advised and the credit delivered, and to take “reasonable care to check the
apparent authenticity of the credit.”
An issuing bank may also request another bank to confirm an irrevocable letter of credit. A
confirmation is an independent promise by a confirming bank that it will pay, accept, or negotiate
a credit, as appropriate, when the documents specified in the credit are presented to it and the
other terms and conditions of the credit have been complied with.
A confirming bank is entitled to reimbursement from the issuing bank if the documents it receives
are in order. If they are not, the confirming bank will be left with title to the goods in its own
name, and it will have to assume the risk of liquidating them as best it can. A confirming bank
also assumes the risk that the issuing bank or the account party may be unable to reimburse it.
Again, it would retain title to the goods, so its losses may be partly offset by whatever price it
gets from the sale of the goods.
The Obligations of Banks – An issuing bank, or any bank that pays, accepts, or negotiates a
letter of credit, is obliged to “examine all documents with reasonable care to ascertain that they
appear on their face in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit.” If a paying,
accepting, or negotiating bank believes the documents are irregular, it is required to pass them
along to the issuing bank for the latter to determine whether it will honor or refuse them. The
issuing bank must do so “on the basis of the documents alone.”
The issuing bank’s obligations only relate to the appearance of the documents. So long as the
documents appear regular on their face, the bank must pay. A bank is not to concern itself with
matters “off the document,” such as the condition of the goods or even their existence.
The Rule of Strict Compliance
In determining whether the documents submitted by the beneficiary are in order, a bank is entitled
to apply the so-called rule of strict compliance. In other words, a bank may reject documents that
do not exactly comply with the terms specified in the letter of credit. Despite all the safeguards,
however, it is still occasionally possible for deceitful persons to create fraudulent documents that
result in big payoffs to the dishonest dealers and sellers.
Amendments
The new UCP 600 rules (2007) issued by the ICC attempt to prevent minor discrepancies from
causing major problems with letters of credit. If there is a major discrepancy or if the seller is
unable to perform as originally agreed, the letter of credit can be amended. Amendments,
however, require the approval of the issuing bank, the confirming bank (if there is one), and the
beneficiary.
Waiver
The new UCP 600 rules provide that if the bank fails to act in a timely fashion or if it fails to
return the documents to the person who presented them, “it is precluded from claiming that the
documents are not in accordance with the terms and conditions of the credit.” In other words,
failure to act is tantamount to an implied waiver.
©2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall