Chapter 17 Output and the Exchange Rate in the Short Run 90
expectations about the duration of policies can alter their qualitative effects. Students may find the
distinction between temporary and permanent, on the one hand, and between short run and long run, on the
other, a bit confusing at first. It is probably worthwhile to spend a few minutes discussing this topic.
Both temporary and permanent increases in money supply expand output in the short run through exchange
rate depreciation. The long-run analysis of a permanent monetary change once again shows how the
well-known Dornbusch overshooting result can occur. Temporary expansionary fiscal policy raises output
in the short run and causes the exchange rate to appreciate. Permanent fiscal expansion, however, has no
effect on output even in the short run. The reason for this is that, given the assumptions of the model, the
currency appreciation in response to permanent fiscal expansion completely “crowds out” exports. This is
a consequence of the effect of a permanent fiscal expansion on the expected long-run exchange rate which
shifts inward the asset-market equilibrium curve. This model can be used to explain the consequences of
U.S. fiscal and monetary policies between 1979 and 1984. The model explains the recession of 1982 and
the appreciation of the dollar as a result of tight monetary and loose fiscal policy.
The chapter concludes with some discussion of real-world modifications of the basic model. Recent
experience casts doubt on a tight, unvarying relationship between movements in the nominal exchange rate
and shifts in competitiveness and thus between nominal exchange rate movements and movements in the
trade balance as depicted in the DD–AA model. Exchange rate pass-through is less than complete and thus
nominal exchange rate movements are not translated one-for-one into changes in the real exchange rate.
Also, the current account may worsen immediately after currency depreciation. This J-curve effect occurs
because of time lags in deliveries and because of low elasticities of demand in the short run as compared to
the long run. The chapter contains a discussion of the way in which the analysis of the model would be
affected by the inclusion of incomplete exchange rate pass-through and time-varying elasticities. Appendix 2
provides further information on trade elasticities with a presentation of the Marshall-Lerner conditions and
a reporting of estimates of the impact of short-run and long-run elasticities of demand for international
trade in manufactured goods for a number of countries.
A discussion of how the current account balance can affect the exchange rate is also illuminating: a country
running a persistent current account deficit will experience a loss in net foreign wealth, which in turn may
depreciate the currency given home biases in consumption. This observation is matched with U.S. data to
illustrate that fiscal expansions in the United States that initially lead to currency appreciations and current
account deficits will, over time, lead to depreciations in the dollar. The chapter concludes with the efficacy
of monetary policy in a liquidity trap. When nominal interest rates are at zero (as they effectively were in
the United States in 2010), any attempt to stimulate the economy through monetary expansion will be
ineffective given that interest rates cannot fall below zero. A modification of the DD–AA model shows that
for a country in a liquidity trap, a section of the AA curve is perfectly elastic. In fact, monetary policy can
only affect output by changing the expected exchange rate. This may explain the unconventional monetary
policies recently taken by the Federal Reserve such as the purchase of long-term government bonds.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Addison-Wesley