23-4
23-16 (30 min.) ROI, comparisons of three companies.
1. The separate components highlight several features of return on investment not revealed
by a single calculation:
a. The importance of investment turnover as a key to income is stressed.
output.
2. (Filled-in blanks are in bold face.)
Companies in Same Industry
Revenue
Income
Investment
Income as a % of revenue
Investment turnover
Return on investment
$1,000,000
$ 100,000
$ 500,000
10%
2.0
20%
$ 500,000
$ 50,000
$5,000,000
10%
0.1
1%
$10,000,000
$ 50,000
$ 5,000,000
0.5%
2.0
1%
Income and investment alone shed little light on comparative performances because of
disparities in size between Company A and the other two companies. Thus, it is impossible to
say whether B’s low return on investment in comparison with A’s is attributable to its larger
investment or to its lower income. Furthermore, the fact that Companies B and C have identical
income and investment may suggest that the same conditions underlie the low ROI, but this
conclusion is erroneous. B has higher margins but a lower investment turnover. C has very small
margins (1/20th of B) but turns over investment 20 times faster.
I.M.A. Report No. 35 (page 35) states:
“Introducing revenues to measure level of operations helps to disclose specific areas for
more intensive investigation. Company B does as well as Company A in terms of income
margin, for both companies earn 10% on revenues. But Company B has a much lower turnover
of investment than does Company A. Whereas a dollar of investment in Company A supports