SOLUTION EXHIBIT 14-35B
Columnar Presentation of Direct Materials Yield and Mix Variances for Nature’s Best Company.
Actual Total Quantity
of All Inputs Used
× Actual Input Mix
× Budgeted Price
(1)
Actual Total Quantity
of All Inputs Used
× Budgeted Input Mix
× Budgeted Price
(2)
Flexible Budget:
Budgeted Total Quantity of
All Inputs Allowed for
Actual Output ×
Budgeted Input Mix
× Budgeted Price
(3)
Almonds 16,000 × 0.33 × $1 = $ 5,280
Cashews 16,000 × 0.47 × $2 = 15,040
Pistachios 16,000 × 0.17 × $3 = 8,160
Seasoning 16,000 × 0.03 × $6 = 2,880
$31,360
16,000 × 0.30 × $1 = $ 4,800
16,000 × 0.50 × $2 = 16,000
16,000 × 0.15 × $3 = 7,200
16,000 × 0.05 × $6 = 4,800
$32,800
15,000 × 0.30 × $1 = $ 4,500
15,000 × 0.50 × $2 = 15,000
15,000 × 0.15 × $3 = 6,750
15,000 × 0.05 × $6 = 4,500
$30,750
$1,440 F $2,050 U
Total mix variance Total yield variance
$610 U
Total efficiency variance
F = favorable effect on operating income; U = unfavorable effect on operating income.
The direct materials mix variance of $1,440 F indicates that the actual product mix uses relatively more
of less expensive ingredients than planned. In this case, the actual mix contains slightly more almonds
and pistachios, while using fewer cashews and substantially less seasoning.
The direct materials yield variance of $2,050 U occurs because the amount of total inputs needed
(16,000 cups) exceeded the budgeted amount (15,000 cups) expected to produce 2,500 tins.
The direct materials yield variance is significant enough to be investigated. The mix variance may be
within expectations, but should be monitored since it is favorable largely due to the use of less
seasoning, which is considered an important element of the product’s appeal to customers.