16-20) During World War II, Nazi Germany conducted human medical experimentation
on large numbers of people held in its concentration camps. Because many German
aircraft were shot down over the North Sea, they wanted to determine the survival time of
pilots downed in the cold waters before they died of hypothermia (exposure to cold
temperatures). German U-boat crew faced similar problems.
In 1942, prisoners at the concentration camp in Dachau were exposed to
hypothermia and hypoxia experiments designed to help Luftwaffe pilots. The research
involved putting prisoners in a tank of ice water for hours (and others were forced to
stand naked for hours at sub-freezing temperatures) often causing death.
Research in the pursuit of national interests using available human subjects is the
ultimate example of questionable bioengineering. Since the Nazi scientific data were
carefully recorded, this produces a dilemma that continues confronts researchers. As a
bioengineer today, should you use these data in the design of any product (such as cold
weather clothing or hypothermia apparatus for open heart surgery?)
a) Since these experiments had government support and were of national interest at
the time, so they should be considered valid and available for scientific use now.
b) Should you use these data since similar scientific experiments have been
conducted in other countries during periods in which national security is
threatened and these data are not questioned today? Even the US conducted
plutonium experiments on unsuspecting and supposedly terminally ill patients
(some of whom survived to old age!)
c) This is just history and should have no bearing on the value or subsequent use of
the data obtained.
d) Experimentation of any kind on unsuspecting or unwilling humans is abhorrent
and unethical and should not be tolerated under any circumstances.
Show your results in an Engineering Ethics Matrix.
1) Apply the Fundamental Canons: Engineers, in the fulfillment of their professional
duties, shall: