Fluid Mechanics, 6th Ed. Kundu, Cohen, and Dowling
Exercise 9.44. The boundary conditions on obstacles in Hele-Shaw flow were not considered in
Example 9.4. Therefore, consider them here by examining Hele-Shaw flow parallel to a flat
obstacle surface at y = 0. The Hele-Shaw potential in this case is:
φ
=Ux z
h
1−z
h
“
#
$%
&
‘
,
where (x, y, z) are Cartesian coordinates and the flow is confined to 0 < z < h and y > 0.
a) Show that this potential leads to a slip velocity of
u(x,y→0) =U z h
( )
1−z h
( )
, and determine
the pressure distribution implied by this potential.
b) Since this is a viscous flow, the slip velocity must be corrected to match the genuine no-slip
condition on the obstacle’s surface at y = 0. The analysis of Example (9.4) did not contain the
correct scaling for this situation near y = 0. Therefore, rescale the x-component of (9.1) using:
x* = x/L, y* = y/h = y/
ε
L, z* = z/h = z/
ε
L, t* = Ut/L, u* = u/U, v* = v/
ε
U, w* = w/
ε
U, and p* = p/Pa,
and then take the limit as
ε
2ReL → 0, with
µ
UL/Pah2 remaining of order unity, to simplify the
resulting dimensionless equation that has
0≅dp
dx +
µ∂
2u
∂
y2+
∂
2u
∂
z2
“
#
$%
&
‘
as its dimensional counterpart.
c) Using boundary conditions of u = 0 on y = 0, and
u(x,y,z)=Uz
h1−z
h
“
#
$%
&
‘+Ansin n
π
hz
“
#
$%
&
‘
n=1
∞
∑exp −n
π
hy
“
#
$%
&
‘
An=−2U
h
z
h
1−z
h
“
#
$%
&
‘sin n
π
h
z
“
#
$%
&
‘
0
h
∫dz
for n = odd, and An = 0 for n = even. [The results here are directly
applicable to the surfaces of curved obstacles in Hele-Shaw flow when the obstacle’s radius of
curvature is much greater than h.]
Solution 9.44. a) From Example 9.4, the u and v velocity components implied by the given
potential are:
u=
∂
∂
x
φ
=Uz
h
1−z
h
%
&
‘ (
)
*
.
Neither of these equations shows any dependence on y, so, as
, the velocity components