Fluid Mechanics, 6th Ed. Kundu, Cohen, and Dowling
Exercise 2.11. Show that for a second-order tensor A, the following quantities are invariant
under the rotation of axes:
I1 = Aii ,
I2=
A
11 A
12
A21 A22
+
A22 A23
A32 A33
+
A
11 A
13
A31 A33
, and I3 = det(Aij).
[Hint: Use the result of Exercise 2.8 and the transformation rule (2.12) to show that I‘1 = A‘ii =
Aii.= I1. Then show that AijAji and AijAjkAki are also invariants. In fact, all contracted scalars of the
form AijAjk ⋅⋅⋅ Ami are invariants. Finally, verify that
I2=1
2I1
2−Aij Aji
“
#$
%
I3=1
3Aij Ajk Aki −I1Aij Aji +I2Aii
“
#$
%
. Because the right-hand sides are invariant, so are I2 and I3.]
Solution 2.11. First prove I1 is invariant by using the second order tensor transformation rule
(2.12):
“
A
mn =CimCnj
TAij →“
A
mm =CimCmj
TAij
.
Use the result of Exercise 2.8,
I1=“
A
mm =
δ
ij Aij =Aii
.
Thus, the first invariant is does not depend on a rotation of the coordinate axes.
Now consider whether or not AmnAnm is invariant under a rotation of the coordinate axes.
Start with a double application of (2.12):
“
A
mn “
A
nm =CimCjn Aij
( )
CpnCqm Apq
( )
=CjnCnp
T
( )
CimCmq
T
( )
Aij Apq
.
From the result of Exercise 2.8, the factors in parentheses in the last equality are Kronecker delta
functions, so
“
A
mn “
A
nm =
δ
jp
δ
iq Aij Apq =Aij Aji
.
Thus, the matrix contraction AmnAnm does not depend on a rotation of the coordinate axes.
The manipulations for AmnAnpApm are a straightforward extension of the prior efforts for
Aii and AijAji.
“
A
mn “
A
np “
A
pm =CimCjn Aij
( )
CqnCrp Aqr
( )
CspCtm Ast
( )
=CjnCnq
T
( )
CrpCps
T
( )
CimCmt
T
( )
Aij Aqr Ast
.
Again, the factors in parentheses are Kronecker delta functions, so
“
A
mn “
A
np “
A
pm =
δ
jq
δ
rs
δ
it Aij Aqr Ast =Aiq Aqs Asi
,
which implies that the matrix contraction AijAjkAki does not depend on a rotation of the coordinate
axes.
Now, for the second invariant, verify the given identity, starting from the given definition