This approximation would enable the elimination of the pressure gradient term in both the
integral momentum and integral energy equations. Then it is possible to combine the integral
momentum and energy equations into a single equation in terms of axial velocity:
The equation (2) is subject to (i) u=Uat r= 0; (ii) u= 0 at r=R; (iii) ∂u/∂r = 0 at
r= 0; (iv) ∂3u/∂r3= 0 at r= 0; and, (v) the condition that the net flow through any cross
section must be the same for any incompressible fluid which may be expressed by:
In the above, the condition (iii) is derived from a consideration of the forces on a cylindrical
element having its axis along the tube centerline. If the pressure and the inertial forces
are to be finite as the radius of the element approaches zero, the viscous force, which is
proportional to ∂u/∂r, must approach zero. The condition (iv) is developed by eliminating
the pressure between the axial momentum and radial momentum equations and considering
the resulting equation as rapproaches zero.
Next, it is noted that at high Reynolds numbers, the profile must allow a thin region of
high shear near the wall in the converging section with a relatively flat profile in the core.
To accommodate these requirements, Morgan and Young construct a polynomial fit which
permits the shear near the wall to become large while maintaining a flat core flow. This fit
where a,b, and care unknown coefficients and λis the value of (r/R) at the juncture sepa-
rating the flat and polynomial parts of the profile. The unknown coefficients are determined
from the no slip condition along with two compatibility conditions u=Uand ∂u/∂r = 0
at (r/R) = λ. The constraint (v) enables expressing λin terms of Rand U. Thus the
polynomial fit profile for uis entirely in terms of U,r, and R. The profile is now introduced
into the equation (2). The resulting first order, non-linear ordinary differential equation is
numerically solved by assuming that Poiseuille flow prevails far upstream of the stenosis.
The solution provides the desired velocity profiles. These are plotted by Morgan and Young.
The wall shear stress is evaluated from
∂ˆrˆ
R1 + ˆ
where ˆ
R0is the slope dˆ
R/dˆzof the wall. The results are included in the paper by Morgan
and Young.
5