Fluid Mechanics, 6th Ed. Kundu, Cohen, and Dowling
Exercise 12.43. Incompressible, constant-density-and-viscosity, fully-developed, pressure-
gradient-driven, turbulent channel flow is often used to test turbulence models for wall-bounded
flows. Thus, for this flow, investigate the following simplified mixing-length model for the
Reynolds shear stress:
−#
u #
v =
β
y
τ
w
ρ ∂
U
∂
y
( )
for 0 ≤ y ≤ h/2 where y is measured from the
lower wall of the channel,
β
is a positive dimensionless constant,
τ
w = wall shear stress (a
constant), and
ρ
= fluid density.
a) Use this turbulence model, the fully-developed flow assumption
, the assumption
of a constant downstream pressure gradient, and the x-direction RANS mom. equ.,
U
∂
U
∂
x+V
∂
U
∂
y=−1
ρ
∂
P
∂
x+
ν∂
2U
∂
x2+
∂
2U
∂
y2
&
‘
(
)
*
+ −
∂
∂
x,
u 2
( )
−
∂
∂
y,
u ,
v
( )
U(y)=u*
β
1+2
ν
β
u*h
!
“
#$
%
&ln 1+
β
u*y
ν
!
“
#$
%
&−2y
h
(
)
*+
,
–
.
b) Does this velocity profile have the proper gradient at y = 0 and y = h/2?
c) Show that this velocity profile returns to a parabolic flow profile as
.
d) How should the constant
β
be determined?
Solution 12.43. a) When the flow is fully developed (U = U(y)ex) the only non-zero field
gradient in the flow direction is ∂P/∂x, so the Reynolds-averaged x-direction momentum
equation simplifies to:
0=−1
ρ
∂
P
∂
x+
ν∂
2U
∂
y2−
∂
∂
y“
u“
v
( )
≅ − 1
ρ
dP
dx +
∂
∂
y
ν∂
U
∂
y+
β
u
τ
y
∂
U
∂
y
$
%
&‘
(
)
where the second approximate equality follows from the given turbulence model with
. Here all the vertical gradients are switched to total derivatives because y is the only
independent variable. Integrate the last form of the equation once in the y-direction:
1
ρ
dP
dx y+const =
ν∂
U
∂
y+
β
u
τ
y
∂
U
∂
y
.
Evaluating this equation at y = 0 determines the constant:
const =
ν
dU dy
( )
y=0=
τ
w
ρ
.
Rearrange the equation to find: . The parametric format of this equation
can be simplified by using a CV to get a simple relationship between
τ
w and dP/dx. Conserve
horizontal (x) momentum in a stationary rectangular CV that encloses all the fluid in the channel
between x and x + Δx. Here the horizontal velocity profile is steady and unchanged between x
and x + Δx, so the unsteady and flux terms are zero. Thus COMOx simplifies to:
, which is a balance of pressure forces on the vertical CV sides
and skin-friction forces on the horizontal CV sides. When this CV equation is rearranged and
the limit as
. Thus, the differential equation for
U(y) can be rewritten:
dU
dy =
τ
w1−2y h
( )
ρ ν
+
β
u
τ
y
( )
=
τ
w1−2y h
( )
ρ ν
+1
2
β
u
τ
h2y h
( )
( )
=
τ
w−2y h +1
( )
1
2
ρβ
u
τ
h2y h +2
ν β
u
τ
h
( )
dU
dy =y dP dx
( )
+
τ
w
ρ ν
+
β
u
τ
y
( )