than willing to share what happened to them. The instructor might also ask about the consequences of
each experience.
2. To facilitate discussion of the “recovery paradox” included in the chapter, the instructor might ask for
a student to share an experience where the service firm originally failed in their service delivery, and
yet recovered very well. Ideally, the student will share that his/her experience, in spite of the failure,
actually has made him/her more loyal to the organization and more satisfied with the services being
provided. If such an example is shared, it can be used to illustrate the recovery paradox. (As
discussed in the chapter, the recovery paradox implies that firms should indeed fail in service delivery
in order to recover, and therefore make customers more satisfied.) After this discussion the question
might be posed to the class as to whether creating a service failure and then providing good recovery
is an appropriate strategy for a firm to pursue, particularly given the experience of the student in class
who was more satisfied after the failure and subsequent recovery than before.
3. In order to discuss service switching, and the reasons customer switch service providers, students
might be asked to think of an experience they have had where they have switched providers. Then,
using Figure 7.7, students may identify one or more causes behind why they switched providers.
Asking students to share their service switching experiences and the causes behind that can help to
illustrate the points being made in that figure.
4. Service guarantees can be a critical part of firm’s service recovery procedures. As discussed in the
chapter, however, guaranteeing service delivery is often difficult for service providers. To stimulate
discussion on the topic, the instructor might ask students about the viability of an instructor offering a
student satisfaction guarantee in the classroom (perhaps in a services marketing class). Given that
students are indeed “experts” in educational services, this should generate some lively discussion.
Some discussion questions include:
What should be guaranteed?
Is a service guarantee appropriate in an educational setting?
How should such a guarantee be written?
How should such a guarantee would be administered and paid out?
What is appropriate compensation?
What are the advantages of providing a guarantee to students?
What are the advantages of providing a guarantee to the instructor?
What are the advantages of providing a guarantee to the university?
What are the disadvantages of providing such a guarantee?
Why is it that universities typically do not offer such guarantees?
Note: Two instructors have actually guaranteed student satisfaction in two of their marketing classes.
[This guarantee is discussed in McCollough, Michael A. and Dwayne D. Gremler (1999),
“Guaranteeing Student Satisfaction: An Exercise in Treating Students as Customers,” Journal of
Marketing Education, 21 (August), 118-130.] The guarantee provided on the next page provides an
example of a version of the guarantee that was based on the one they constructed for use in their
classes. Copies of this guarantee could be distributed to the class and then critiqued using the criteria
provided in Chapter 7.
Sample Student Satisfaction Guarantee: