whole or part.
IM APP 2-16
concerning the solution they would recommend.
6.8
The chosen solution appeared to satisfactorily solve the group’s stated problem.
6.9.1
The group held a “last–chance” discussion in which each member played the devil’s
advocate role, raising one possible unforeseen event that could impede the success
of the final solution.
6.9.2
Our group developed a contingency plan for dealing with these unforeseen
circumstances.
VII. Implementation:
7.1
After deciding on a recommended solution, the group generated a chronological list
of steps for implementing the solution.
7.2
The group generated a realistic timetable for completing the steps.
7.3
The group spent time discussing any variables that might hinder or assist in the
implementation of the solution and how to manage these variables.
7.4
The group clearly identified all needed resources for the accomplishment or
implementation of the solution generated.
7.5
The group assigned members to oversee the accomplishment of each step.
VIII. Follow Up
8.1
The group determined a process for reviewing the desired solution outcomes.
8.2
A date was established for re-evaluating how well the solution will have worked over
time.
8.3
Responsibilities were clearly assigned for the collection of follow-up evaluation data.
IX. Writing the Report
9.1
The group reviewed the assignment specifications so that each member understood
what materials must be submitted for a grade.
9.2
Tasks were assigned for preparing the final report.
9.3
All group members participate fully and equally in preparing the final report.
Your Rating
225-250
200-224
175-199
150-174
50-149
Compute Points
# of 1s (X) 1 =
# of 2s (X) 2 =
# of 3s (X) 3 =
# of 4s (X) 4 =
# of 5s (X) 5 =
Total points:
whole or part.
IM APP 2-17
GROUP PROCESS EVALUATION FORM:
RELATIONAL FUNCTIONS
Student’s Name:
Please circle the appropriate number for each item below, in response to the question:
How well did our group accomplish this step?
Rate each item a scale of 1 to 5, where
1 = Our group did not do this.
2 = Our group occasionally did this.
3 = Our group usually did this, but with inconsistent results.
4 = Our group did this well.
5 = Our group demonstrated superior performance in this aspect.
1
The group created an atmosphere that encouraged openness
and sharing.
1
2
3
4
5
2
Communication channels in the group were open and used
by all members.
1
2
3
4
5
3
Differences of opinion were considered and worked
through to mutual satisfaction.
1
2
3
4
5
4
All group members were encouraged to offer information.
1
2
3
4
5
5
Group members did not allow one or two persons to impose
their ideas on the group.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Each group member was consulted to check his/her
understanding of each step.
1
2
3
4
5
7
Group members stayed on task.
1
2
3
4
5
8
During the group process, individual members discussed
how well the group was functioning.
1
2
3
4
5
Compute Points
# of 1s (X) 1 =
# of 2s (X) 2 =
# of 3s (X) 3 =
# of 4s (X) 4 =
# of 5s (X) 5 =
Total:
Your Rating
36-40
32-35
28-31
24-27
8-23
whole or part.
IM APP 2-18
WORKING AS A TEAM – OBSERVATION*
Name: Date:
List all team members:
Answer thoroughly the following questions about your teamwork. Think about how
individuals contributed to your group presentation. Be aware of what worked and what
did not.
TEAM ROLES
1. Did one or more of the team members become leader? If so, how did this happen?
2. Describe each member’s contribution to the completion of the assignment. Be specific,
and use descriptive, not evaluative language.
3. To what degree was participation equal? If participation was balanced, how did this
happen? If not, why do you think balance was not achieved?
4. Who was most productive in churning out ideas? Who was especially creative? What
did these people do?
5. How well did members critique one another’s ideas? Were the critiques constructive
or destructive? Explain.
TEAM PROCESS
6. Did your team establish from the beginning an overall plan for completing the
assignment? If so, who suggested it?
7. Were all members encouraged to participate in group discussions? If so, how was this
done? Did anyone act like a “social loafer”? Was anyone intimidated by the others?
8. How did you determine who would write which sections? Did each member complete
their assigned topics?
9. When there was disagreement, how did members resolve it?
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
10. Please add your own brief narrative, providing any additional comments about your
team that you would like me to know.
Adapted from Lana Wolverton, Alta High School
whole or part.
IM APP 2-19
GROUP PRESENTATION EVALUATION
Title of Group Presentation:
Names of Group Members:
Rating scale: 5 = Excellent, 4 = Above Average, 3 = Average, 2 = Below Average, 1 = Poor
Instructor’s Evaluation of Group
Content
Rating
Comments
1.
Meaningful Presentation (Substantive,
informative)
2.
Theoretically Consistent (Group members did
not contradict one another)
3.
Well Executed (Well prepared and delivered)
4.
5.
6.
Creative (Ingenuity of physical and
theoretical design)
Showed Group Effort (Hard work)
Introduction and Statement of Problem Shows
Clarity and Thorough Understanding
7.
Presentation Was Interesting and Dynamic
Delivery added to Overall Effect
Organization
8.
Main Points Were Clear, Introduction &
Conclusions Achieved Purpose
9.
Transitions Contributed to Clarity, Order of
Speakers Contributed to Continuity of Group
Research
10.
Support (visual and verbal) Followed
Logically to Support the Argument Made
whole or part.
TEAM PARTICIPATION EVALUATION
Team # ________
Your group will have a total of _______ points to distribute among your members (10 x
number of group members). Your task is to decide, as a group, how to equitably
apportion the points among members. The decision is to be made by the group as a whole
(that is, by all members who are present on the appointed day).
Not all points need to be distributed. Please understand that the points are not “gifts”;
rather, they must have been honestly earned. To that end, your team must justify its
decisions by writing a brief paragraph about EACH MEMBER, explaining why your
team awarded him or her that particular number of points.
When determining points for each member, consider the following items:
–attendance: Did this person attend most in-class as well as out-of-class
meetings?
-discussion: With what quality and quantity did this participant contribute to the
team dialogue?
–follow through on assigned tasks: Did this individual carry through with his or
her assigned tasks?
–cooperativeness: Did this person enhance the supportive climate of the group?
Did s/he encourage others to participate? Was s/he an active listener as well as a
contributor?
–general interest in the project and the team: Was this member on time for
meetings? Did s/he seem interested?
At the end of the allotted time, your team must submit to me one page that includes the
following information:
1. an alphabetized list of all team members (last name, first name)
2. the number of points awarded to each member
3. a brief paragraph about each individual justifying the number of points awarded
to that person
whole or part.
IM APP 2-21
RATING OF OTHER GROUP MEMBERS*
Name: ___________________________________Subject: __________________________________
THESE RATINGS ARE CONFIDENTIAL. They are for instructor use only. Rate every group member
(except yourself) with a score from 0 to 100. Whatever score you give, you must justify it, or it will not be
considered.
For scoring use the following scale:
Below 60 = Poor 70 = Average 80 = Good 90 = Very Good 100 = Excellent
Name of Group Member:
Category
Rating
Justification
Commitment
Participation
Cooperativeness
Contribution
Name of Group Member:
Category
Rating
Justification
Commitment
Participation
Cooperativeness
Contribution
Name of Group Member:
Category
Rating
Justification
Commitment
Participation
Cooperativeness
Contribution
Name of Group Member:
Category
Rating
Justification
Commitment
Participation
Cooperativeness
Contribution
(You may make additional comments on the back of this sheet.)
whole or part.
IM APP 2-22
GROUP REPORT: PEER ASSESSMENT
In addition to your instructor’s evaluation, your peers will assess you on your class presentation
using the following form:
For each category, indicate your observation of the group by circling the appropriate number.
Add comments to explain your number choice.
1=inadequate or not done 3=adequate 5=outstanding, fantastic, far more than adequate
1 2 3 4 5 Organization: Was the context set and the question clear enough that you could
understand it? Did the presentation appear organized and understandable? (In
other words, did you know what they were talking about?)
1 2 3 4 5 Content: Did you learn something from it? Did it give you new information?
Did it appear that the group sought and found information?
1 2 3 4 5 Interest level: Was it interesting enough to keep your attention? Did the group
think about you, the audience, present to you, and keep you interested?
1 2 3 4 5 Workload: Did the group show evidence of having worked hard? Did it appear
that they worked and learned?
1 2 3 4 5 Coordination: Did the group appear to work together? Did each member connect
to the others and appear as a group? Were they coordinated?
TOTAL NUMBER OF POINTS GROUP TOPIC:
whole or part.
IM APP 2-23
TEAM MEMBER EVALUATION FORM*
This form is confidential. Your instructor will use the information you provide to help determine
how the points for your team project will be divided among the members of your team.
Follow these steps to arrive at your ratings:
1. Determine the value of each member’s contribution by completing the rating forms
below.
2. After evaluating each member, use the area on the last page to determine the distribution
of points that you think is most fair.
YOUR NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings).
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
TEAM MEMBER’S NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings.
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
whole or part.
IM APP 2-24
TEAM MEMBER’S NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings).
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
TEAM MEMBER’S NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings).
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
TEAM MEMBER’S NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings).
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
whole or part.
IM APP 2-25
TEAM MEMBER’S NAME
1. Value to the team on the task level: Provides/asks for important information, initiates discussion,
gives instructions, tests reality, clarifies, summarizes, diagnoses, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
2. Value to the team in promoting effective relationships: Harmonizes interaction, relieves tension,
offers praise, listens empathetically, gives praise when appropriate, etc.)
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
3. Ready and willing to work hard on the project: Well prepared, committed to the team’s goal, keeps
in touch, attends meetings).
Poor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Outstanding
SUMMARY OF POINT ALLOCATION
Your name: _______________ deserves _____% of team grade
Member’s name: _______________ deserves _____% of team grade
Member’s name: _______________ deserves _____% of team grade
Member’s name: _______________ deserves _____% of team grade
Member’s name: _______________ deserves _____% of team grade
Note: Total of all members’ contributions above should equal 100 %
*This form was contributed by Ron Adler
SELF-CRITIQUE OF SPEECH
1. Overall impression: As I watched myself on video, my first comments and reactions
were:
2. Delivery: When I watch myself without sound, I notice the following about my
• Eye contact
• Hands/gestures
• Body movement
• Facial expression
3. Organization:
Strengths of my organization are:
Weaknesses of my organization are:
4. Content:
Strengths of my content are:
Weaknesses of my content are:
5. After watching, I think my presentation would be better and clearer for the audience if
I would:
6. The best aspect of my presentation was:
whole or part.
IM APP 2-27
SPEECH FEEDBACK FOR CLASSMATES
Your name:
Speaker’s name:
Topic:
1. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the introduction?
2. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the organization?
3. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the supporting material (visual and
verbal)?
4. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the delivery?
5. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the conclusion?
6. Overall, what did you like best about the presentation?