Chapter 09 – Improving Job Performance with Goals, Feedback, Rewards, and Positive Reinforcement
9-2
the types of rewards that can influence behavior and why these rewards often fail to
motivate. Finally, Chapter 9 discusses positive reinforcement and the various
schedules of reinforcement which can be used to influence and shape employee
behavior.
Performance management is a continuous cycle of improving individual job
performance with goal setting, feedback and coaching, and rewards and positive
reinforcement. Figure 9-1 illustrates the factors that foster ongoing performance
management and improvement.
Employees with a clear line of sight understand the organization’s strategic goals and
know what actions they need to take, both individually and as team members. There
are two types of goals: a performance outcome goal (targets a specific end-result) and a
learning goal (strives to improve creativity and develop skills). Goal setting is a
cornerstone of the management by objectives (MBO) technique. The three steps in
implementing a goal-setting program are: goal setting, goal commitment, and support
and feedback. Managers should set SMART goals. That is, goals that are specific,
measurable, attainable, results oriented, and time bound. Table 9-1 presents guidelines
for writing SMART goals. Goal commitment is important because employees are more
motivated to pursue goals viewed as reasonable, obtainable, and fair. Providing
support and feedback requires providing employees with the skills and information to
get the job done.
Feedback is information about individual or collective performance shared with those in
a position to improve the situation. Feedback serves two functions: it is instructional
and it is motivational. Personality characteristics (e.g., self-esteem, self-efficacy, or self–
monitoring), needs, and goals influence one’s desire for feedback. People tend to
perceive and recall positive feedback more accurately than they do negative feedback.
Negative feedback can have a positive motivational effect but it can also damage self–
efficacy. After receiving feedback, people cognitively evaluate factors such as its
accuracy, source credibility, fairness of the system, performance-reward expectancies,
and the reasonableness of the standards to determine the relative importance to give to
the feedback. 360-degree feedback allows individuals to compare their own perceived
performance with feedback from their supervisor, subordinates, and peers. Such
programs should maintain anonymity and not be linked to pay or promotion decisions.
Rewards are a critical component of a performance improvement cycle. Figure 9-2
presents the important components of organizational reward systems. Rewards may be
extrinsic or intrinsic. Extrinsic rewards come from the environment while intrinsic
motivation is driven by positive feelings associated with doing well on a task. Extrinsic
rewards include financial/material and social rewards, while psychic rewards are
intrinsic. Three criteria for the distribution of