Chapter 02 – Managing Diversity: Releasing Every Employee’s Potential
2-2
marital status, parental status, personal habits, recreational habits, appearance and
educational background. Organizational dimensions include seniority, job title, work
location, work content, work department, union affiliation and management status.
Affirmative action is an outgrowth of equal employment opportunity legislation. It is an
artificial intervention aimed at giving management a chance to correct an imbalance, an
injustice, a mistake, or outright discrimination that occurred in the past. Although
affirmative action programs created opportunities for women and minorities, they are
perceived negatively by white males and have been found to negatively affect women
and minorities. In contrast, managing diversity enables people to perform up to their
maximum potential. Managing diversity entails recognition of the unique contribution
every employee can make. Effectively managing diversity requires organizations to
adopt a new way of thinking about differences among people. Successful diversity
management focuses on altering an organization’s culture and infrastructure to enable
people to perform up to their maximum potential. Successful management of diversity
requires education, enforcement, and exposure to others.
Several demographic trends are creating an increasingly diverse workforce. First, more
women are breaking though the glass ceiling, the barrier or roadblock that prevented
women from advancing to higher level positions, but must now navigate a labyrinth with
twists, turns, and obstructions on their path to career success. Second, racial groups
are encountering a glass ceiling and perceived discrimination. Third, there is a critical
mismatch between workers’ educational attainment and occupational requirements.
Finally, there are generational differences in the workforce and the workforce is getting
older. Generational differences between the Traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Gen Xers,
Millennials and Gen 2020 are summarized in Table 2-1. These diversity trends carry
distinct managerial implications. To attract the best workers, companies must adopt
policies that meet the needs of diverse workers.
Research shows that there are both positive and negative effects of diversity on
important work outcomes. There are two major theoretical approaches that help us
understand the effects of diversity in the workplace. Social categorization theory holds
that similarities and differences are used as a way to categorize people into groups.
People tend to favor in-groups relative to out-groups. The social categorization model
supports the idea that group homogeneity is better than group heterogeneity in terms of
affecting work-related attitudes, behavior, and performance. In contrast,
information/decision-making theory predicts the opposite and contends that diversity
leads to better task-relevant processes and decision making. Interestingly, research
supports both theories. Research shows there can be a negative relationship between
diversity dimensions and the quality of interpersonal processes and group dynamics but
a positive relationship between diversity dimensions and task-relevant processes and
decision making. Figure 2-3 further explores the relationship between diversity and
important work outcomes.
Organizations encounter a variety of barriers when attempting to implement diversity
initiatives. The most common barriers to successful implementation of diversity