Quick search
Join
Home
>
Solution Manual
>
978-0078025914 Chapter 7 Solution Manual Part 2
Sidebar
Close
978-0078025914 Chapter 7 Solution Manual Part 2
0
Helpful
0
Unhelpful
March 30, 2020
Related documents
Econ 120 Practice Test Answers
Chapter 1 Business And Its Environment
Sociology
Wow My Love
Case Report Laquinta
Article Review: Administrators and Accountability: The Plurality of Value Systems in the Public Domain
FC 42957
FC 62472
FIN 91396
FE 34842
Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
M7
–
14
(a) Perpetual FIFO
Goods in Inve
ntory
Goods Sold
Unit
Total
Unit
Total
Date
Description
Units
Cost
Cost
Units
Cost
Cost
July 1
Beginning inve
ntory
2,000
$
40
$
80,
000
July 5
Sold 1,000
units
(1,000)
40
(40,
000)
1,000
$
40
$40,000
July 13
Purchased
6,000
44
264,000
July 17
Sold 3,000
units
(1,000)
(2,000)
40
44
(40,000)
(
88
,000)
1,000
2,000
40
44
40,000
88
,000
July 25
Purchased
8,000
50
400,000
July 27
Sold 5,000 units
(4,000)
(1,000)
44
50
(176,00
0)
(
50
,000)
4,000
1,000
44
50
176,000
50
,0
00
Total
7,000
$350,000
9,000
$394
,0
00
(b) Perpetual LIF
O
Goods in Inve
ntory
Goods Sold
Unit
Total
Unit
Total
Date
Description
Units
Cost
Cost
Units
Cost
Cost
July 1
Beginning invent
ory
2,000
$
40
$ 80,000
July 5
Sold 1,000
units
(1,000)
40
(
40,000)
1,000
$
40
$
40
,000
July 13
Purchased
6,000
44
26
4,000
July 17
Sold 3,000
units
(3,000)
44
(132
,000)
3,000
44
132,000
July 25
Purchased
8,000
50
40
0,000
July 27
Sold 5,000
units
(5,000)
50
(250,00
0)
5,000
50
250,000
Total
7,000
$
322,0
00
9,000
$422,000
M7
–
15
Remaining
Perpetual FIFO
Units
Unit Co
st
Tot
al Cos
t
Inventory Value
a)
Pu
rcha
se January 1
3
00
$7.00
$2,1
00
$2,1
00
b)
Purchase January 8
45
0
8.00
3,6
00
5,7
00
c)
Sale
(
300
)
7.00
(2,10
0)
3,6
00
(
300
)
8.00
(2,40
0)
1,2
00
d)
Purchase January 29
750
9.00
6,750
7,95
0
Ending Inventory
$7,950
[(150
x $8) + (750 x $
9)]
Cost of Good
s
Sold
$4,500
[(300 x $7)
+
(300 x $8)]
Remaining
Perpetual LIFO
Units
Unit Co
st
Tot
al Cos
t
Inventory Value
a)
Purchase January 1
3
00
$7.00
$2,1
00
$2,1
00
b)
Purchase January 8
45
0
8.00
3,6
00
5,7
00
c)
Sale
(
450
)
8.00
(3,600)
2,100
(
150
)
7.00
(1,050)
1,050
d)
Purchase January 29
750
9.00
6,750
7,800
Ending Inventory
$7,800
[(150 x $7) + (750 x $9)]
Cost of Good
s
Sold
$
4,650
[(450 x
$8) + (150 x $7)]
Perpetual
Weighted A
verage
Remaining
Units
Unit Co
st
Tot
al Cos
t
Inventory Value
a)
Purchase January 1
3
00
$7.00
$2,1
00
$2,1
00
b)
Purchase January 8
45
0
8.00
3,6
00
5,7
00
Available for Sale
750
5,700
c)
Sale
(
60
0)
7.60*
(4,
56
0)
1,140
d)
Purchase January 29
750
9.00
6,750
7,890
Ending Inventory
$7,890
[(150 x $7.60) + (750 x $9)]
Cost of Good
s
Sold
$
4,56
0
[(600 x
$7.60
)]
M7
–
16
To determine the
effects of i
nventory errors on the financial statements in both the
curren
t
year and the following year, use the cost of goods sold e
quation. An error that
understates 20
15
ending inventory by $10,000 would have the followin
g effects
:
20
15
Beginning Inv
entory
Accurate
+ Purchases of merchandise during the year
Accurate
–
Ending Inventory
Understated by $10,000
= Cost of Goods Sold
Overstate
d by $10
,000
Gross Profit
Understated by $10,000
20
16
Beginning Inventory
Understated by $10,000
+ Purchases of merchandise during the year
Accurate
–
Ending Inventory
Accurate
= Cost of Goods Sold
Understated by $10,000
Gross Profit
Overstate
d by $10
,000
M7
–
17
20
15
Beginning Inventory
Accurate
+ Purchases of merchandise during the year
Accurate
–
Ending Inventory
Overstate
d by $10
0,000
= Cost of Goods Sold
Understated by $100,000
Gross Profit
Overstate
d by $10
0,
000
20
16
Beginning Inventory
Overstate
d by $10
0,000
+ Purchases of merchandise during the year
Accurate
–
Ending Inventory
Accurate
= Cost of Goods Sold
Overstate
d by $10
0,000
Gross Profit
Understated by $100,000
7
–
14
Soluti
ons
Manual
©
2016
by McGraw
–
Hill Educ
ation. All
rights reserv
ed. No rep
rod
uction
or distribution witho
ut the prior writ
ten co
nse
nt of McGraw
-Hill
Educ
ation.
ANSWE
RS T
O EXERC
ISES
E7
–
1
No
(a)
On November 2, SCC received goods on con
signment
from App
arel Corp.
No
(b)
On October 31, SCC received goods on consi
gnment from Apparel Corp.
Yes
(c)
Goods
in
tran
sit
to
SCC
we
re
shipped
by
Shoe,
Inc.
on
October
31,
FOB
shipping po
int.
No
(d)
Go
ods
in
transit
to
SCC
were
sh
i
pped
by
S
hoe,
Inc,
on
Octob
er
31,
FOB
destination.
E7
–
2
Inventory
Cost of Goods Sold
Present Balance
+$ 70,000
+$ 420,000
a.
–
10,000
–
b.
–
5,000
–
c.
+8,000
–
8,000
d.
–
3,000
+3,000
Approp
riate Bala
nce
$ 60,000
$ 415,0
00
E7
–
3
(a)
Accounts Payable
…………………………………………….
………
10,000
Inventor
y
…………………………………………………….
…
10,0
00
(b)
Supplies
………………………………………………………….
………
5,000
Inventor
y
…………………………………………………….
…
5,000
(c)
Inventor
y
…………………………………………………………
………
8,000
Cost of Goods Sold
………………………………………
………
8,000
Sales Revenue
…………………………………………………
…….
15,000
Accounts Receivable
…………………………………….
………
15,000
(d)
Cost of Goods Sold
…………………………………………..
………
3,000
Inventor
y
…………………………………………………….
…
3,000
E7
–
4
Req. 1
Beginning Inventory
12
units x $8
$
96
+ Purchase
38
units x
$9
342
+ Purchase
20
units x $
11
220
Goods Available for Sale
70
units
$
658
Ending Inventory Un
its =
24
.
a)
FIFO
Goods Available for Sale
$ 658
–
Ending Inventory
(LIST)
(4 × $9
) + (
20
x $
11
)
256
Cost of Goods Sold
(FIFO)
(12
x $8) + (
34
× $9
)
$
402
b)
LIFO
Goods Available for Sale
$ 658
–
Ending Invento
ry
(F
IST)
(
12
× $9) + (
12
x $8)
204
Cost of Goods Sold
(L
IFO)
(20 × $1
1
)
+ (
26
x
$9)
$ 454
c)
Weighted average unit cost: Cost o
f Goods A
vailable for Sale
$658
# Units Available for Sale
70
un
its
Weighted Ave
ra
ge
Goods Available for Sale
$ 658
.00
–
Ending Inventory
(
24
× $9.40)
225.
60
Cost of Goods Sold
(
46 × $9.40
)
$
432.40
Req. 2
Using
FIFO
will
result
in
re
porting
the
highest
net
income
b
ecause
Cost
of
Goods
Sold
is
the lowest
when using FIFO in times
of rising unit costs
.
= $9.40 per unit
E7
–
5
Req. 1
Beginning Inventory
120 units
x $
80
$ 9,
60
0
+ Purchase
38
0 units x $
90
34,
20
0
+ Purchase
20
0 units x $
11
0
22,
00
0
Goods Available for Sale
700 units
$ 65,
80
0
Req. 2
Goods Available for Sale
$ 65,
80
0
Cost of Goods Sold
(FIFO)
(12
0 x $80) + (120 × $90
)
Goods Available for Sale
$ 65,
80
0
Cost of Goods Sold
(L
IFO)
(200
× $110
)
+ (40 x $90)
Goods Available for Sale
$ 65,
80
0
Cost of Goods Sold
(
240 × $
94
)
E7
–
6
Req. 1
Beginning Inventory
3
00
units x $
12
$
3,
600
+ Purchase
9
00
units x
$10
9,
000
+ Purchase
8
00
units x $
13
10
,400
Goods Available for Sale
2,000
units
$ 23,000
Req. 2
Goods Available for Sale
Cost of Goods Sold
(FIFO)
(30
0 x $12) + (600 × $
10
)
Goods Available for Sale
Cost of Goods Sold
(L
IFO)
(
800
× $13
)
+ (
100
x $
10
)
E7
–
6 (continued)
Req. 4
ORION IRON CORP.
Inco
me Sta
tement
FIFO
LIFO
Weighted
Average
Sales Revenue
1
$36,000
$
36
,000
$
36
,000
Cost of Good
s
Sold
9,6
00
11
,4
00
10,3
50
Gross Profit
26
,4
00
24
,6
00
25
,6
50
Operating Expenses
19
,5
00
19
,5
00
19
,5
00
Income
from Operati
ons
$6,9
00
$5
,1
00
$6,150
Computations:
(1)
Sales: (300
units @ $
40) + (600 units @ $40) = $
36
,000
Req. 5
Comparison of Amounts
FIFO
LIFO
Weighted
Average
Income
from Operati
ons
$
6,9
00
$
5,
100
$
6,1
50
Ending Inventory
13,
400
11
,6
00
12,6
50
The above tab
le
demonstrates that the operating income difference when comparing
any two case
s is exactly the s
ame as the inve
ntory difference. Differences in inventory
have a do
lla
r
–
for
–
dollar effect on In
come f
rom Operati
ons.
The me
thod w
ith the hig
hest
ending inventory always has the highest In
come from Operations. The weighted
average
method always falls between the
FIFO and LIFO methods.
Req. 6
The
L
IFO
method
minimizes
income
taxes
because
it
re
ports
less
taxable
inco
me
as
a
result
of
using
higher
unit
costs (
in th
is ca
se) to
calcula
te
Cost
of
Goods
Sold.
A high
er
Cost
o
f
Goods
Sold
me
ans
less
I
ncome
from
Opera
tions
an
d
therefore
reduces
i
ncome
tax
es
.
E7
–
7
Req. 1
Beginning Inventory
3,000
units x $
8
$
24,000
+ Purchase
9,500
units x $ 9
85,500
+ Purchase
5,000
units x $
11
55,000
Goods Available for Sale
17,500 units
$ 164,500
Req. 2
Ending Inventory Units =
Units Available
–
Uni
ts Sold = 17,500
–
12,000 = 5,500 un
its
.
Re
q. 3
FIFO
Goods Available for Sale
$ 164,500
–
Ending Inventory
(LIST)
(5,00
0 × $
11
) + (500
x $9)
59,500
Cost of Goods Sold
(FIFO)
(3,0
00 x $8) + (9,0
00 × $9
)
$
105,000
LIFO
Goods Available for Sale
$ 164,500
–
Ending Inventory
(F
IST)
(3,0
00 × $8) + (2,500 x $9)
46,500
Cost of Goods Sold
(L
IFO)
(5,00
0 × $11
)
+ (7,000 x $9)
$
118,000
Weighted a
verage
unit cost:
$164,500
17,500 units
Weighted Ave
ra
ge
Goods Available for Sale
$ 164,
500
–
Ending Inventory
(5,500 × $9.40)
51,700
Cost of Goods Sold
(
12,000 ×
$9.40
)
$
112,800
Req. 4
SCORES
BY INC.
Inco
me Sta
tement
Fo
r the Year E
nded Decembe
r 3
1
FIFO
LIFO
Weighted
Average
Sales Revenue
[(4,000 x $29
) + (8,000
x $31)]
$
364
,000
$
364
,000
$
364
,000
Cost of Good
s
Sold
105
,000
118
,000
112,8
00
Gross Profit
259
,000
246
,000
251,2
00
Operating Expenses
250
,000
250
,000
250
,000
Income
(Loss) from
Operations
$
9,000
$ (4,0
00)
$
1,2
00
= $9.40 per unit
E7
–
7 (continue
d)
Req. 5
Comparison of Amounts
Case A
Case B
Case C
FIFO
LIFO
Weighted
Average
Income
from Operati
ons
$
9,000
($
4,000)
$
1,2
00
Ending Inventory
59,5
00
46,500
51,7
00