PB13–6
Req. 1
($112,000 ÷ $1,120,000) x 100 = 10.00%
($42,000 ÷ $336,000) x 100 = 12.50%
[($1,120,000 – $672,000) ÷ $1,120,000] x
100 = 40.00%
[($336,000 – $180,000) ÷ $336,000] x
100 = 46.43%
$1,120,000 ÷ $770,000* = 1.45
$336,000 ÷ $192,000* = 1.75
($112,000 – 0) ÷ [($798,000 + $798,000) ÷
2] x 100 = 14.04%
($42,000 – 0) ÷ [($266,400 +
$266,400) ÷ 2] x 100 = 15.77%
$112,000 ÷ 33,600** sh. = $3.33
$42,000 ÷ 12,600 sh. = $3.33
$1,120,000 ÷
[($77,000 + $65,800) ÷ 2] = 15.69
$336,000 ÷
[($28,000 + $27,200) ÷ 2] = 12.17
$672,000 ÷
[($154,000 + $133,000) ÷ 2] = 4.68
$180,000 ÷ [($30,000 + $45,600) ÷ 2]
= 4.76
$266,000 ÷ $168,000 = 1.58
$434,000 ÷ $1,232,000 = 0.35
$84,000 ÷ $350,400 = 0.24
* The problem indicates that the end-of-year ending balance approximates the average for the year.
1. Each set of financial statements is audited and each received an unqualified
opinion; therefore, there is no preference in terms of credibility of information.
2. Profitability—Gunnar Company had a higher gross profit percentage (46.43%
versus 40.00%) and net profit margin than Thor Company (12.50% versus 10.00%).
4.68; 77 days versus 78 days). Thor Company has a higher receivables turnover
(15.69 versus 12.17; 23 days versus 30 days), which indicates that Thor does