CASE 19.1
MAYS ELECTRONICS (concluded)
d.
e. Total net cost reduction:
Automated insertion 100,000$ (from part d)
Factor
redesi
n 90,000 ($100,000 + $10,000 – $20,000)
Leasin
machine 65,000 ($80,000 – $15,000)
Just-in-time s
stem 40,000 ($45,000 – $5,000)
Qualit
trainin
and bonus 207,000 ($122,000 + 120,000 – $35,000)
Total net cost reduction 502,000$
The total net cost reduction per unit equals $4.18 ($502,000/120,000 units). From part c,
the cost per unit needed to be reduced by $6, so even with the combined actions, the target
cost has still not been reached.
Net cost reduction
target profit of $4, the target cost per CB equals $10 ($14 – $4). The current cost per unit is
$16 ($1,920,000/120,000 units) so to reach the target, costs must be reduced by $6 ($16 –
$10).
$8).
The net cost reduction of switching to automated insertion is $100,000 ($90,000 + $20,000 +
$40,000 – $50,000). The per unit cost reduction would be $0.83 ($100,000/120,000 units). To
maintain current market share, the cost per unit must be reduced by $6 from part c.
Switching to automated insertion does not result in enough cost savings to reach the target
cost.