Financial Reporting and Analysis 6e The Role of Financial Information in Contracting
3. The “events of default” section of the loan agreement describes circumstances in
which the creditor has the right to terminate the lending relationship.
4. A common action is to renegotiate the loan agreement.
5. If the covenant violation is insignificant, lenders may give the borrower a grace
period to cure the covenant breach.
6. If the violation is significant, lenders my accelerate loan repayment (with
interest) and terminate its relationship with the borrower.
C. Mandated Accounting Changes May Trigger Debt Covenant Violation: New
reporting standards are issued to enhance the relevance and representational
faithfulness of financial statements.
1. A new FASB or IFRS standard may trigger a debt covenant violation.
2. Many loan agreements have financial covenants that rely on “fixed GAAP”, the rules
in place when the loan was first granted.
3. When “fixed GAAP” is not permitted, lenders still have the option to waive or
renegotiate the covenants.
D. Managers’ responses to potential debt covenant violations:
1. Since violating a covenant is costly, managers have strong incentives to make
accounting choices that reduce the likelihood of technical default.
a. Technical default occurs when the borrower violates one or more loan
covenants, but has made all interest and principal payments.
i. Net worth and working capital restrictions are the most
frequently violated accounting-based covenants.
ii. According to one study, “abnormal” discretionary
accounting accruals
(i.e., noncash financial statement adjustments that accrue
revenue or accrue expenses) were found to significantly
increase reported earnings in the year prior to technical
default.
b. Payment default occurs when the borrower is unable to make the
scheduled interest or principal payment.
2. Management tends to make accounting method changes and/or to
manipulate discretionary accruals to avoid violating debt covenants.
3. Violating debt covenants may require the corporation to pay penalties, a
higher rate of interest, or possibly could cause bankruptcy procedures.
III. MANAGEMENT COMPENSATION
A. Managers have incentives to use company assets for their personal benefit at the
expense of owners.
1. Potential conflicts of interest can be overcome if managers are given incentives
which cause them to behave like owners.
2. Two ways of aligning managers’ incentives with owners’ interests are to link
compensation to stock returns and/or financial performance measures such as
accounting earnings.
a. Managerial strategies and decisions clearly affect share prices in the long run,
but short-run share prices could change because of factors that are outside of
management’s control.
b. Earnings are probably less susceptible to the influence of temporary and
external economic forces, but earnings can be criticized for its reliance on
accruals, deferrals, allocations, and valuations that involve varying degrees of