Problem 3A-4 (continued)
b. The unit product cost of each model under the activity-based ap–
proach would be computed as follows:
Direct materials ………………………………
Direct labor:
$10 per DLH × 1.8 DLHs, 0.9 DLHs …..
Manufacturing overhead (above) ………..
Total unit product cost ……………………..
Comparing these unit cost figures with the unit costs in Part 1(b), we
find that the unit product cost for Model X200 has increased from
$180 to $213, and the unit product cost for Model X99 has decreased
from $104 to $98.50.
3. It is especially important to note that, even under activity-based costing,
70% of the company’s overhead costs continue to be applied to prod-
Machine setups (number of setups) …
Special processing (machine-hours) …
General factory (direct labor-hours) …
Total overhead cost ……………………..
Thus, the shift in overhead cost from the high-volume product (Model
X99) to the low-volume product (Model X200) occurred as a result of
reassigning only 30% of the company’s overhead costs.
The increase in unit product cost for Model X200 can be explained as