VII. Global View
A. Accounting for Plant Assets – Cost, depreciation, additional
expenditures and disposals of plant assets are treated similarly
under both GAAP and IFRS. The one area where there are
differences is in accounting for changes in the value of plant
assets. IFRS requires an annual review of useful life and salvage
value estimates.
1. Decreases in the Value of Plant Assets – When the value of plant
assets declines after acquisition, but before disposition, both
GAAP and IFRS require companies to record those decreases
as impairment losses. GAAP revalues impaired plant assets to
fair value whereas IFRS revalues them to a recoverable amount.
2. Increases in the Value of Plant Assets – GAAP prohibits
companies to record increases in the value of plant assets.
IFRS permits upward asset revaluations. If an impairment was
previously recorded, a company would reverse that impairment
to the extent necessary and record that increase in income. If
the increase is beyond the original cost, that increase is
recorded in comprehensive income.
B. Accounting for Intangible Assets – GAAP and IFRS are broadly
similar in terms of cost determination, depreciation, additional
expenditures and disposals of intangible assets, however these two
systems handle decreases and increases in the value of intangible
assets differently. IFRS requirements for recording increases in
the value of intangible assets are so restrictive that such increases
are rate.
VIII. Decision Analysis—Total Asset Turnover
A. Total asset turnover is a measure of a company’s ability to use
its assets most efficiently and effectively.
B. Calculated by dividing net sales by average total assets.
C. It is safe to say that all companies desire a high total asset
turnover. However, interpreting a company’s total asset
turnover requires an understanding of the company’s
operations.
2. Other operations are labor intensive, meaning that they
generate sales more by the efforts of people than the use of
assets; a higher total asset turnover would be expected.