10% to 15%. She believes 10% is the more accurate estimate but knows that
both the corporation’s internal and external auditors allow some flexibility in
estimates. What is the effect of increasing the estimate of bad debts from 10%
to 15% of accounts receivable? How does this “bank” income for future
years? Why does Mary Beth’s proposal present an ethical dilemma?
Key issues
Increasing the bad debt estimate from 10% to 15% of accounts receivable increases bad
debt expense in the current year, reducing net income. If 10% ends up being the correct
estimate of future bad debts, then the company will be able to report less bad debt
expense in the following year, increasing net income in the following year. The effect of
this change in estimate is to shift profits from this year to next year.
How do you define “accurate” reporting?
Option 1: Record the estimate of bad debts for 10% of accounts receivable
An assumption of financial reporting is that accountants present financial information
that is reliable and accurate. Knowing that 10% is the correct percentage for bad debts
expense, Mary Beth should not make the adjustment.
One key factor in Philip’s decision is the opportunity to receive a bonus. While tempting,
he needs to be able to remove any personal benefits in making the best decision for the
company and its investors.
Option 2: Record the estimate of bad debts for 15% of accounts receivable
In the long run, it is likely that the bad debts expense will smooth itself out, so a
temporary adjustment is not going to change investors’ decisions.
The adjustment to bad debts expense is allowable under GAAP, as the overriding
principles of GAAP allow us to use discretion. Further, Mary Beth has good reason to
believe the auditors will approve this change, thus this is not that big of an issue.
Ultimately, Mary Beth should not feel responsible for this decision to change the
percentage. Her boss is advising her what to do, so is it worth her job to oppose/confront
him on this decision?
We have extra profits this year, so why not hang onto them. We may need some in future
years when profits are not as high. Thus, we are really protecting our investors by
maintaining smooth earnings.
Since the direction of “earnings manipulation” is to lower profits in the current year, we
are actually understating our current performance. Understating performance is
acceptable, since no one is misled into thinking the company is better than it really is.