Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
17. Given:
a. The trend may be non-linear (although most students will view it as linear). Trend-adjusted
smoothing would have a slight edge over a linear trend line.
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
3–22
Education.
TAFt + .3(At – TAFt) = St
Tt–1 + .3 (TAFt – TAFt–1 – Tt–1) = Tt
50.00 + .3(49 – 50.00) = 49.70
51.70 + .3(52 – 51.70) = 51.79
2.00 + .3(51.70 – 50.00 – 2.00) = 1.91
53.70 + .3(48 – 53.70) = 51.99
1.91 + .3(53.70 – 51.70 – 1.91) = 1.94
53.93 + .3(52 – 53.93) = 53.35
1.94 + .3(53.93 – 53.70 – 1.94) = 1.43
54.78 + .3(55 – 54.78) = 54.85
1.43 + .3(54.78 – 53.93 – 1.43) = 1.26
56.11 + .3(54 – 56.11) = 55.48
1.26 + .3(56.11 – 54.78 – 1.26) = 1.28
56.76 + .3(56 – 56.76) = 56.53
1.28 + .3(56.76 – 56.11 – 1.28) = 1.09
57.62 + .3(57 – 57.62) = 57.43
1.09 + .3(57.62 – 56.76 – 1.09) = 1.02
18. a. As shown in the plot of Unit Sales, there appears to be a trend in Unit Sales.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Unit Sales
Units
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
3–23
Education.
b. Deseasonalize car sales: Units Sold / Index (round to two decimals)
c. Plotting the deseasonalized data on the same graph as the Units Sold data leads us to a
different conclusion than the conclusion in part a. There appears to be a downward trend in
sales.
d. Part c indicated a downward trend in sales. We could forecast sales of the first three months
of the next year by fitting a monthly trend line to the deseasonalized values using t = 0 in
December of the previous year. Then, predict trend values for the first three months of next
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Unit Sales & Deseasonalized Data
Units
Deseasonalized
3–24
Education.
19. Deseasonalize the values, where:
Deseasonalized sales = (Actual sales) / (Seasonal relative) (round to two decimals):
Deseasonalized sales for quarter 1: 88/1.10 = 80.00
quarter of next year: (140.00 + 20) * 1.10 = 176.00.
Round MAD & MSE to two decimals:
25.25
19
202
:
00.4
9
36
:
MSE
MAD
11.10
110
91
:
30.2
10
23
:
MSE
MAD
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
3–25
Education.
a. MAD F1: 32/8 = 4.00 (round to two decimals)
MAD F2: 24/8 = 3.00 (F2 appears to be more accurate)
MAD would be more natural.
d. MAPE calculations (round to two decimals):
MAPE (F1): 42.69%/8 = 5.34%
MAPE (F2): 32.84%/8 = 4.11%
Because 4.11% < 5.34%, F2 appears to be more accurate.
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
3–26
Education.
22. a. Compute MSE & MAD for each forecast method (round to two decimals). Round % to two
decimals.
MAD F1: 28/10 = 2.80
MAD F2: 36/10 = 3.60
b. Compute MAPE for each forecast method (round to two decimals).
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
3–27
Education.
c. Naïve Method Forecast
Round MSE, MAD, TS, & control limits to two decimals:
It appears that the naïve forecast is in control because its tracking signal at the end of Week
10 is within the limits. However, the MAD and MSE values for the naïve method are much
higher than the MAD and MSE values for the other two forecasting methods (refer to the
table below). Therefore, the naïve forecasting method does not appear to be performing as
well as the other two forecasting methods.
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
Y = 316.12 – 19.53X
Actual data are represented by circles.
Predicted values are represented by pluses.
Round r to four decimals:
2222 )()()()(
))(()(
yynxxn
yxxyn
r
b. r = –0.9854 implies a strong, negative relationship between price and demand.
Chapter 03 – Forecasting
26. a.
b.
Round b & a to two decimals:
58.0
)366()078,12)(13(
)076,1)(366()329,31)(13(
)( 222
xxn
yxxyn
b