12-7
Education.
the formal ERP system has let them down too many times. Most businesses cannot function
without the ERP system working properly; therefore, reliability is critical.
Critical Thinking Exercises
1. An end item, such as the chair, is considered to be an independent demand item with uniform
demand. It is appropriate to use EOQ/ROP for the independent demand items because the
assumption of continuous (uniform) usage and continuous monitoring is met.
The components and parts that go into end items are considered to be dependent demand items.
Their demand is dependent on the demand for the respective end items. Demand for parts and
components tends to be lumpy and not continuous. Therefore, instead of continuous stocking and
monitoring levels of inventory, these parts need to be stocked just prior to the time they will be
needed for manufacturing. This policy of stocking just prior to the need on the shop floor will in
turn assist in reducing inventory investment.
In addition, while demand for independent demand items, such as the chair, is forecasted, demand
for the parts, such as the legs, side rails, back support, etc., is calculated based on the demand for
the chair. If EOQ/ROP approach is used for the dependent demand parts, too much unnecessary
time could be spent to forecast each and every individual part. Because each forecast would be
independent, there could be great amount of discrepancy and disagreement between the forecast
for the end item and the forecast for the various parts.
Therefore, it would be very inefficient to use the EOQ/ROP approach for the dependent demand
items. Using an EOQ/ROP system for controlling component inventory will lead to problems
such as too little inventory for some items, too much inventory for other items, and late orders for
end items. For these items, instead of using EOQ/ROP approach, the company should consider
installing an MRP system.
2. Student answers will vary. Some possible answers are listed below.
MRP: If anyone lied about information that they input to the MRP system, this action would
violate the Virtue Principle.
ERP: If a project manager in charge of an ERP implementation rewarded project team members
with different amounts of time off, this action would violate the Fairness Principle. If the project
team carelessly rushed through an ERP implementation so that team members could return to
their primary functional roles, this action would violate the Utilitarian Principle. If a project
manager intentionally over-stated the benefits and under-stated the costs of an ERP
implementation, this action would violate the Virtue Principle.