Chapter 07 – Cross-Cultural Communication and Negotiation
3. What was the problem of Danone Wahaha joint venture that triggered the conflict
between the companies? What were the differences in Danone’s and Wahaha’s
understanding of their own respective roles and responsibilities in this venture?
What aspects of national and organizational culture affected this perspective?
Answer: The dispute between Danone and Wahaha involved differences on how the
trademarks in the joint venture were to be used, and who actually controlled the
company. Wahaha believed that it owned all rights to the Wahaha trademark and
was able to establish brands outside the joint venture that used the Wahaha name.
Danone felt that the trademark belonged to the joint venture, a company that
Danone believed it controlled. Because Wahaha did not fully understand the
4. Was Danone successful in proving its claims in court? How was the conflict
between the two companies resolved? What were the key lessons for Danone about
doing business in China?
Answer: In 2006, Danone accused Wahaha of violating the terms of the joint
venture and offered to buy the company out. When Wahaha rejected the offer,
Danone immediately filed lawsuits claiming that Wahaha had used the trademark
illegally and in doing so, threatened the viability of the joint venture. A total of ten
5. Did Danone follow the advice regarding JVs in China listed in the list just above?
Which aspects did it follow and which did it not?
Answer: Most students will probably agree that Danone failed to fully follow any of
the rules for joint ventures in China. The company made assumptions about how
7-24